IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
C. Swamidoss(deceased) - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent
W.P.No.10561 of 2020
Decided on : 03-03-2025
ORDER :
This petition is filed to Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order dated 09.09.2019 bearing No.AG ( A&E)/ Legal Cell/WP 21405/2009/2019-20/ passed by the 5th respondent and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents to sanction pension in favour of the petitioner w.e.f 05.06.1981 by granting relaxation in terms of para 4 of G.O.Ms.37 dated 05.01.1983 with all consequential benefits and arrears of pay and allowances together with interest at 12% p.a and pass orders.
2. Mr.C.Swamidoss who has initially filed the writ petition in the year 2020 passed away due to which her wife/ A.Alagurathi was impleaded in this writ petition..
3. The facts of the case is that the deceased/C.Swamidoss joined as a Head Clerk ( non-teaching staff) on 05.08.1963 at Ayyanadar Janagiammal College, Sivakasi which is an Aided College under Government of Tamil Nadu and he resigned from the service on 14.08.1978 on medical grounds. The grievance of the deceased/C.Swamidoss is that he is entitled for pension and he approached the respondents and gave representation several times, pursuant to which the 3rd respondent on 26.03.2007 passed an order stating that he is not entitled for pensionary benefits as he had resigned from the service after the crucial date ie 01.04.1976. Aggrieved over the same the deceased/C.Swamidoss filed W.P.No.21405 of 2009 and this Court vide order dated 07.06.2018 allowed the writ petition. When this being the case, the 5th respondent passed the present impugned order wherein the claim of the deceased/C.Swamidoss for grant of pension was rejected. Hence, this petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Government introduced Liberalised Pension Scheme to the retired teaching staff of aided colleges. Subsequently G.O.Ms.No.2213 dated 11.10.1976 was passed extending the benefit to non-teaching staff of aided colleges, who retired from service with effect from 01.04.1916 and the crucial date was fixed on 01.04.1976. As per G.O.Ms.No.1015,01 liberalised pension scheme was extended to the incumbents who had resigned from service. Subsequently, the Government has passed G.O.MS.No.37 dated 05.01.1983 which provides that the incumbents who resigned before the crucial date 01.04.1976 were also entitled for pension with effect from 05.06.1981. The learned counsel for the petitioner further contend that as per G.O.Ms.No.1015, dated 05.06.1981 and G.O.Ms.No.37, dated 05.01.1983 the deceased/C.Swamidoss is entitled to get pensionary benefits with effect from 05.06.1981 as he resigned from service with effect from 14.08.1978.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the deceased/petitioner was a non-teaching staff and he resigned from the job and it was accepted by the appointing authority, since there was no provision to pay pension at that point of time, he failed to make a claim. Subsequently, the Government introduced Liberalised Pension Scheme. Since the Liberalised Pension Scheme was not applicable to those incumbents who have resigned prior to the introduction of the said scheme, the Government passed various orders to protect the interest of the staff members. Hence, prays to allow this petition.
6. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents filed a counter, wherein it was stated that the extent rule provisions under the Pension Scheme for the staff of Non-Teaching Government Educational Institutions do not allow for the grant of pension to the petitioner. It was further stated in the counter affidavit that the Joint Director of Collegiate Education/the First Respondent has rejected the representation dated 08.06.2009 made by the deceased/C.Swamidoss to relax the rule provisions to grant pension to him. They have further stated that they have considered afresh the claim of the deceased/C.Swamidoss, relaxing the Rules, afresh in the light of the observations made in the order dated 07.06.2018 of this Court in W.P.No.21405 of 2009 a
Pension eligibility for non-teaching staff is contingent upon resignation before the crucial date; those resigning after are ineligible for benefits.
Point of law: practice of the Government issuing Government Orders for fulfilling the needs of individual persons, for one reason or the other, should be put a stop to, as otherwise the clause of equ....
Pensionary benefits apply to individuals who resigned before the crucial date of 05.06.1981 under certain regulations.
A teacher's continuous service before the cut-off date of 1.4.2003 qualifies for old pension benefits despite later regularization, affirming the principle of service continuity.
The court ruled that the entire service of the petitioner from 1979 to 2015 must be considered for pension calculation, subject to the deposit of management contributions, as earlier cut-off dates we....
Pension scheme - Deduction of monthly salary - since the Petitioner No. 1 had been appointed prior to 1st November, 2005 and occupied a part time fully aided post i.e. receiving 100% grant-in-aid fro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that teachers at State-aided educational institutions in Uttar Pradesh are governed by the Applicable Rules and not the Government Employees Rules.....
Validity of voluntary retirement and entitlement to pension benefits under A.P. Revised Pension Rules, 1980.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.