Ibrahimsha vs State Represented by: The Inspector of Police, Madurai District

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1354

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
Ibrahimsha – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by: The Inspector of Police, Madurai District – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:S. Shanmuga Velayutham, Senior Counsel, J. Yogeswaran, A.K. Alagar Samy, M. Murugesan, Advocates. For the Respondent: S. Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai made in S.C.No.147 of 2015 dated 06.02.2019.)

R. Subramanian, J. & N. Sathish Kumar, J.

This appeal has been filed by the appellants/ accused Nos.1 and 3 as against the conviction and sentence, dated 06.02.2019, made in S.C.No.147 of 2015, by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai.

2. The appellants/A1 and A3 stood convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment as detailed hereunder:

	Conviction U/s.	Sentence of imprisonment	Fine amount
A-1and A3	302 r/w 34 IPC	To undergo life imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.
A-1and A3	506(ii) IPC	To undergo Rigorous imprisonment for one year	-

(Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.)

3. The brief facts of the prosecution is as follows:

(i) Accused 1 and 3 are friends. The deceased along with A1 and other accused murdered one Kalidas in the year 2005. In that case, A1 and one Anees alone were convicted and sentenced

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1354

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMARIbrahimsha – AppellantVersusState Represented by: The Inspector of Police, Madurai District – Respondent

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
Ibrahimsha – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by: The Inspector of Police, Madurai District – Respondent