SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1400

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Pitchaiammal - Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Madurai & Others - Respondent
W.P.(MD) No. 5513 of 2022
Decided On : 29-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:J. Gunaseelanmuthiah, Advocate. For the Respondents: M. Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules - The court directed the first respondent to take necessary steps to hand over possession of the property to the petitioner, a senior citizen, within a specified period, based on the petitioner's representation and the statutory provisions under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act and Rules.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a senior citizen, sought a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to hand over possession of a property based on an order from the Revenue Divisional Officer, which had not been implemented. The petitioner had given a representation under Rule 21 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, which had not been considered, leading to the filing of the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner, being a senior citizen, was entitled to protection under the statutory provisions and that there was a statutory bar for institution of civil suits pertaining to senior citizens involving matters covered under the Act. The court concluded that it was necessary to come to the petitioner's rescue and directed the first respondent to hand over possession of the property within a specified period.

Issues: The issues involved the failure to implement the order from the Revenue Divisional Officer, the petitioner's representation under Rule 21 of the Rules, and the statutory protection for senior citizens under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the statutory provisions under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act and Rules, which provided protection to senior citizens and imposed a statutory bar on civil suits pertaining to senior citizens involving matters covered under the Act.

Final Decision: The court directed the first respondent to take necessary steps to hand over possession of the property to the petitioner, thereby disposing of the Writ Petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take necessary steps to handover the possession to writ petitioner D.No.7, Jamburapuram Main Road, Goripalayam, Madurai – 2 as per Rule 21 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rule, 2009 based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2022.)

1. This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking to direct the first respondent to take necessary steps to hand over possession of the property bearing D.No.7, Jamburapuram Main Road, Goripalayam, Madurai – 2 as per Rule 21 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 [hereinafter referred to as 'said Rules'] based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2022.

2. The petitioner is a senior citizen, she had initiated proceedings against her son under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. By order dated 12.11.2021, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, directed the petitioner's son to return back possession of the aforementioned property to the petitioner. Since the possession has not been handed over to the petitioner till date, the petitioner gave a representation on 03.03.2022 under Rule 21 of the said Rules, requesting the third respondent to implement the order dated 12.11.2021 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Heard Mr.J.Gunaseelanmuthiah, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. The petitioner is aged 69 years. Admittedly, she is having the benefit of an order dated 12.11.2021 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai under which her son has been directed to return back possession of the property to the petitioner. Admittedly, the said order has not been implemented till date. Rule 21 of the said Rules also enable the petitioner to seek the assistance of the police to protect her interest as she is a senior citizen. The petitioner has also given a representation under Rule 21 of the said Rules with the respondents. Admittedly, the said representation has not been considered till date. Rule 21 of the said Rules enables the petitioner to give such a representation. Under Section 27 of the Act, there is statutory bar for institution of civil suits pertaining to senior citizens involving matters which are covered under the provisions of the Act.

5. Even though learned Special Government Pleader on instructions would submit that the petitioner has accepted to go before the Civil Court in the presence of the police, when there is a statutory bar, that too when the petitioner has herself approached this Court by filing a writ petition, this Court will have to necessarily come to her rescue as she is a senior citizen and harassed by her own son as seen from the order dated 12.11.2021 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the first respondent to take necessary steps to hand over possession of the property bearing D.No.7, Jamburapuram Main Road, Goripalayam, Madurai – 2, by evicting the petitioner's son and daughter-in-law from the said premises within a period of four [4] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top