SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1410

R. HEMALATHA
T. R. Thangavel – Appellant
Versus
Thangammal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:N. Manokaran, Advocate. For the Respondent:D. Rajagopal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 20.07.2011 passed in A.S. No.45 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal, reversing the decree and judgment dated 29.11.2008 passed in O.S. No.32 of 2008, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruchengode (transferred O.S. No.809 of 2002 of Subordinate Court, Namakkal).)

1. The appellant is the defendant in O.S. No.32 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tiruchengode (transferred O.S. No.809 of 2002 of Subordinate Court, Namakkal). The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for the following reliefs.

“1) To pass a decree for specific performance of contract directing the defendant to receive the balance sale consideration of Rs.25,000/- and execute a sale deed and register the same within the time to be specified by the Court and if the defendant failed to do so, order to deposit the sale price into Court, execute and register the sale deed by this Court on behalf of the defendant (or) in the alternative

2) directing the defendant to repay the advance amount of Rs.75,000/- plus Rs.25,000/- towards damages for non execution of the sale deed with in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top