BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
PARESH UPADHYAY, R. VIJAYAKUMAR, JJ.
N. Kannan - Appellant
Versus
Yadhavar Kalvi Nidhi, A Registered Society Running Yadhava College & Yadhava College of Education, Represented by the Hon'ble Court appointed Administrator, Madurai & Others - Respondent
W.A(MD). Nos. 29 & 30 of 2022 & CMP(MD). Nos. 586 & 587 of 2022
Decided On : 12-04-2022
Membership Drive - Dispute over administration of society and college - Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1860; Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 - The court found that the appointment of an administrator did not confer the power to induct new members, as it would disturb the democratic process and take away the supremacy of the general body. The order passed by the learned Single Judge was set aside, and the Writ Appeals were allowed.
Fact of the Case:
Disputes arose over the administration of Yadhavar Kalvi Nidhi society and Yadhava College. The government appointed a Special Officer to administer the society and the college, which was challenged in multiple writ petitions. A retired Judge of the High Court was appointed to take over the administration and management of the society and the college.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of an administrator did not confer the power to induct new members, as it would disturb the democratic process and take away the supremacy of the general body. The order passed by the learned Single Judge was set aside, and the Writ Appeals were allowed.
Issues: Dispute over the power of the administrator to conduct a new membership drive and the interpretation of the scope of the administrator's powers.
Ratio Decidendi: The administrator appointed by the High Court superseded only the committee and not the general body. Any permission granted to the administrator to induct new members would disturb the democratic process and take away the supremacy of the general body.
Final Decision: The order passed by the learned Single Judge was set aside, and the Writ Appeals were allowed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in WA(MD).No.29 of 2022: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 22.12.2021 passed in W.M.P(MD).No.18282 of 2021 in W.P(MD).No.21216 of 2019 and allow this Writ Appeal.
WA(MD).No.30 of 2022: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 22.12.2021 passed in W.M.P(MD).No.18286 of 2021 in W.P(MD).No.21218 of 2019 and allow this Writ Appeal.)
Common Judgment
R. Vijayakumar, J.
1. The present Writ Appeals in WA(MD).Nos.29 and 30 of 2022 arise out of interim orders passed in W.M.P(MD).Nos.18282 and 18286 of 2021 in W.P(MD).Nos.21216 and 21218 of 2019 respectively.
2. In W.A(MD).No.29 of 2022, the fifth respondent in the writ petition is the appellant. In W.A(MD).No.30 of 2022, the sixth respondent in the writ petition is the appellant.
2.(i). Factual background:
Yadhavar Kalvi Nidhi was registered as a society in the year 1962 under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1860. The said Society started Yadhava College in the year 1969. Later, the Society was deemed to be registered under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. The said Society is the Educational Agency of Yadhava College. The College is governed by the provisions of Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976. The said facts are not in dispute.
3. In the year 2018, several disputes arose between the office bearers on one side and members on the other side of the society with regard to the administration of the Society and the College. Since there was stalemate in the administration of the society and the college, the Inspector General of Registration submitted a report. The Government passed G.O.(Ms).No.96, Commercial Taxes and Registration (M1) Department on 27.07.2018 under which a Special Officer was appointed to administer the Society by invoking Section 34-A of Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. The said Government order was challenged by one K.P.Navaneethakrishnan in W.P(MD).No.17982 of 2018.
4. The Government issued G.O (Ms).No.212 , Higher Education (D2) Department on 05.09.2018 appointing a Special Officer to administer the Yadhava College by invoking Section 14-A of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976. The said Government order was challenged by one K.P.Navaneethakrishnan under W.P(MD).No.20242 of 2018.
5. Several Writ petitions were filed before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court relating to the administration of the above said society and college. On 12.04.2019, the Principal Secretary to Government issued a proceeding to the Inspector General of Registration requesting him to identify the life members of the society and thereafter, prepare a list of genuine members of the society and conduct the election. On 26.06.2019, the Inspector General of Registration has sent a communication to the Special Officer appointed to administer the society directing him to identify the genuine and qualified members of the society and thereafter, conduct the election. One Mr.G.Veluchamy filed W.P(MD).No.21216 of 2019 seeking mandamus to prepare electoral list/membership list and hold elections to the Society strictly in accordance with the above said proceedings dated 12.04.2019 and clarification dated 26.06.2019.
6. On 17.09.2019, the Deputy Inspector of Registration who was the Special Officer of the Society issued an election notification for conducting election to the Society. The said election notification was challenged by one K.P.Navaneethakrishnan in W.P(MD).No.21218 of 2019.
7. Appointment of Administrator:
7(i). Apart from the above referred writ petitions, some other writ petitions were also filed touching upon the administration and management of the Society as well as the College. All the writ petitions were heard together and a common order was passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 31.03.2021. As per the said order, G.O.Ms.No.96, Commercial Taxes and Registration (M1) Department, dated 27.07.2018 under
The appointment of an administrator does not confer the power to induct new members, as it would disturb the democratic process and take away the supremacy of the general body.
Provisions of Societies Registration Act mandating election of governing body by majority of society members override bye-laws requiring trustee co-option when trustees lack unanimity due to internal....
The court reaffirmed that cooperative society membership is a personal right requiring statutory notice prior to removal, and that an administrator lacks authority to confer membership, ensuring adhe....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the General Body meeting and election process under the Societies Registration Act, 1975.
Interim relief and appointment of an administrator in Society management disputes must be based on complete pleadings and afford natural justice, and should not be granted if it effectively decides t....
The Assistant Registrar lacked jurisdiction to review prior decisions regarding membership induction, and the failure to notify affected members violated natural justice principles.
Point of Law : Sec.2(l) of KCS Act defines “member” as “member” means a person joining in application for registration of a co-operative society or a person admitted to membership after such registra....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.