Kombu Raj vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1490

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
Kombu Raj – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:R. Anand, Advocate. For the Respondent: A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District in S.C.No.172 of 2017 dated 05.04.2019.)

1. Aggrieved over the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District in S.C.No.172 of 2017 dated 05.04.2019, the present appeal came to be filed by the appellants.

2. The appellants/A-1, A-2 and A3 stood convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment as detailed hereunder:

	ConvictionU/s.	Sentenceofimprisonment	Fine amount
A-1	294(b)IPC	Toundergothreemonthsimprisonment	Rs.1,000/-indefault,toundergothreemonthssimpleimprisonment
	302IPC	To undergo lifeimprisonment	Rs.1,000/-indefault,toundergosixmonthssimpleimprisonment
	506(ii)	To undergo seven years imprisonment	Rs.1,000/-indefaulttoundergosixmonthssimpleimprisonment
A2&A3	294(b)	To undergo three months imprisonment	Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment
	342IPC	To undergo one year imprisonment	Rs.1,000/-indefault,to undergo three

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1490

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMARKombu Raj – AppellantVersusState Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi – Respondent

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
Kombu Raj – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi – Respondent