IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C. Praveen Kumar, Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, JJ.
Mr. Chukka Kantha Rao, Krishna Dist. Another – Appellants
Versus
P.P., Hyd. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.562 of 2016
Decided On : 09-02-2023
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 read with 34 and 304 Part-I - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Sections 207, 209,428 and 313 - causing the death - Examination of accused - Deceased are neighbours and known to each other. P.Ws.4 to 6 are said to be residents of Village, Mandal - Daughter of A-1 by pulled some creepers from fencing of the house of P.W.2 for which, P.W.2 scolded the girl - she went away and informed A-1. A-1 grew wild and came to house of P.W.2 in the afternoon along with his daughter, quarreled with P.W.2 and also abused her in filthy language - Held, Appellants/accused of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 I.P.C - Appellants/accused are found guilty of offence punishable under Section 304 Part-I read with 34 I.P.C.convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of eight (08) years while confirming the fine imposed - Period of detention underwent by appellants/accused during the course of investigation case and after conviction shall be given set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C - Criminal Appeal is partly allowed.
JUDGMENT :
C.Praveen Kumar, J.
Accused Nos.1 and 2 in Sessions Case No.424 of 2012 on the file of the learned XV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nuzvid are the appellants herein. They were tried for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for causing the death of one Polimetla Sobhan Babu (hereinafter, referred to as “the deceased”) on 26.03.2009 at 7.45 p.m. at the house of A-1 at Kanumolu Village, Bapulapadu Mandal.
2. Vide judgment, dated 09.06.2016, the learned Sessions Judge convicted A-1 and A-2 for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and accordingly, sentenced them to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month each.
3. The facts in issue are as under:-
P.W.2 is the wife of the deceased. A-1 and the deceased are neighbours and known to each other. P.Ws.4 to 6 are said to be the residents of Kanumolu Village, Bapulapadu Mandal. On 26.03.2009, at about 2.00 p.m., the daughter of A-1 by name Sukanya pulled some creepers from the fencing of the house of P.W.2 for which, P.W.2 scolded the girl. Later, she went away and informed A-1. A-1 grew wild and came to the house of P.W.2 in the afternoon along with his daughter, quarreled with P.W.2 and also abused her in filthy language. The deceased was not present in the house at that time. A-1 abused P.W.2 stating that she could not conceive children and he would help her in producing children. In the evening after 7.00 p.m., the deceased came to his house by which time, quarrel between P.W.2 and A-1 was continuing. Then, A-1 and A-2 took the deceased to the house of A-1, which is situated nearby the house of the deceased, where A-2 is alleged to have caught hold of both the hands of the deceased by holding them to the back side of his body. Then, A-1 hit the deceased on the head with a spear. Thereafter, A-2 hit the deceased on the back side with a stick used to cut grass. A-1 and A-2 beat the deceased with the above instruments on head and shoulders for which, the deceased fell down after sustaining injuries. There was heavy bleeding to the deceased. At that time, P.W.2, Prakash and Katamala Moshe were present. Immediately, they shifted the injured in an auto belonging to one Kiran to Eluru Government Hospital and admitted him there. Thereafter, he was shifted to Global Hospital, Vijayawada on the advise of the Doctors. After admitting the injured in Global Hospital, Vijayawada, the injured died at 2.30 a.m. on 27.03.2009.
Law was set into motion by lodging a report with P.W.11 – Sub Inspector of Police, Hanuman Junction Police Station, which came to be registered as a case in Crime No.51 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 I.P.C. Ex.P-10 is the F.I.R.
P.W.12 – Inspector of Police, Hanuman Junction Circle, who took up investigation from P.W.11, visited the scene of offence at Kanumolu Village, at the house of A-1 and noticed blood stained steel bowls and blood stained earth. After observing the scene of offence, he prepared a Scene Observation Report in the presence of P.W.9 and one Nani Babu. Ex.P-6 is the Scene Observation Report. He also prepared a rough sketch of the scene of offence, which is marked as Ex.P-11. From the scene, he visited Global Hospital, Vijayawada where he conducted inquest over the dead body of the deceased in the mortuary of the hospital and prepared a report in the presence of witnesses. Ex.P-5 is the Inquest Report. After conducting inquest, he sent the body for post mortem examination.
P.W.10, who was working as an Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, conducted autopsy over the dead body of the deceased and issued Ex.P-9 – Post Mortem Certificate. The Doctor noticed two injuries and according to him, the cause of death of the deceased was due to head injury and its complications.
On 31.03.2009, basing on the information re
As the attack is an outcome of the said incident, which took place immediately prior to the incident, we feel that it is a fit case where the nature of offence has to be scaled down from Section 302 ....
The accused did not have the intention to kill the deceased, but only the knowledge that their actions could likely cause his death, leading to the alteration of their conviction from Sec. 302 IPC to....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and murder, based on the absence of premeditation, undue advantage, or cruel behavior by the accused.
The prosecution failed to prove the involvement of A.2, A.4, and A.5 in the crime, while sufficient evidence supported the conviction of A.1 for murder.
It is the quality and not the quantity which determines the adequacy of evidence. Evidence has to be weighed not counted.
The court clarified that common intention and premeditation are essential for a murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, and absence of these elements can lead to a lesser charge.
The court reclassified a murder charge to culpable homicide due to unresolved doubts regarding witness credibility and the actual circumstances of the incident.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.