SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1585

N. ANAND VEKATESH
P. Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
Mathivanan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M.R. Khapali, Advocate. For the Respondents:R3, G. Prakash, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.11.2013 made in A.S.No.80 of 2012 on the file of the Sub-Court at Poonamallee by confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 06.08.2012 made in O.S.No.530 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Ambattur.)

1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this Second Appeal.

2. The suit was filed by the plaintiff seeking for the relief of Specific Performance of the agreement of sale dated 24.1.1989, marked as Ex.A-1.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendants entered into an agreement of sale with the plaintiff on 24.1.1989 and the total sale consideration was fixed as Rs.25,000/-. The further case of the plaintiff is that an advance amount of Rs.15,000/- was paid to the defendants and the defendants agreed to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff within 20 months from the date of agreement.

4. The plaintiff further pleaded that he was always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and accordingly, approached the defendants during the 2nd week of June 1990 and requested the defendants to receive the balance amount and execute the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top