SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1618

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
Tamil Nadu Survey Officers Union (Central) Represented by its General Secretary, Tiruvannamalai - Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Chennai & Others - Respondent
W.P.No. 10465 of 2020 & WMP.Nos. 16548, 16414, 12723 of 2020
Decided On : 28-04-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Raghavachari, G. Elanchezhiyan, AL.Gandhimathi, Niranjan Rajagopalan, Advocates. For the Respondents:R1 & R2, R. Shunmugasundaram, Advocate General, assisted by T. Chezhiyan, Additional Govt. Pleader.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Amendment to Chain Survey and Land Records Manual - Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 - Section 13(h) - Summary: The court considered a writ petition challenging the amendment to the Chain Survey and Land Records Manual, which included the Village Administrative Officer in the surveying process. The petitioner argued that the amendment was without authority and violated the Act. The respondents contended that the amendment was necessary to expedite the disposal of pending applications and that VAOs were technically qualified for surveying. The court found that the amendment was intended to expedite the work and facilitate the public without prejudicing the petitioners' service or promotional opportunities. The court also held that the petitioner association had no locus standi to challenge the impugned Government Order and dismissed the writ petition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the amendment to the Chain Survey and Land Records Manual, which included the Village Administrative Officer in the surveying process, arguing that it was without authority and violated the Act. The respondents contended that the amendment was necessary to expedite the disposal of pending applications and that VAOs were technically qualified for surveying.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the amendment was intended to expedite the work and facilitate the public without prejudicing the petitioners' service or promotional opportunities. The court also held that the petitioner association had no locus standi to challenge the impugned Government Order and dismissed the writ petition.

Issues: The issues involved in the case were the authority of the amendment to the Chain Survey and Land Records Manual, the technical qualifications of VAOs for surveying, and the locus standi of the petitioner association to challenge the impugned Government Order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendment was intended to expedite the work and facilitate the public without prejudicing the petitioners' service or promotional opportunities. The court also held that the petitioner association had no locus standi to challenge the impugned Government Order and dismissed the writ petition.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the amendment to the Chain Survey and Land Records Manual, holding that the amendment was intended to expedite the work and facilitate the public without prejudicing the petitioners' service or promotional opportunities. The court also held that the petitioner association had no locus standi to challenge the impugned Government Order.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in G.O.(Ms.)No.173 dated 26.03.2020 and quash the same as illegal, ultra vires and totally without jurisdiction insofar as it has included the Village Administrative Officer in the amendment under Section 13(h) to the Chain Survey and Land Records, Manual, Part II, Chapter I.)

The petitioner, challenging the impugned Government Order in G.O.(Ms)No.173, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Survey and Settlement Wing, [SS-II(2)] Section dated 26.03.2020, insofar as it includes the Village Administrative Officer in the amendment under Section 13(h) to the Chain Survey and Land Records Manual, Part II, Chapter I, has filed the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner, in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, has averred as follows:

2.1. The petitioner Association is a registered body and is duly recognised by the State of Tamil Nadu, vide G.O.Ms.No.896, P&AR (Per.K) Department dated 26.08.1981. "Survey" works forms an integral part of orderly administration. The Survey and Land Reforms Department is in existence for over 217 years. The said department is technical and manned by persons well equipped with modern instruments and infrastructures to measure the area/extent of land, division of plots, villages, towns as well as cities.

2.2. The post of Firka Surveyor is a promotional post from the post of Field Surveyor and the minimum qualification for appointment as Firka Surveyor is that an individual should have to passed Firka Surveyor Test Paper I & II, conducted by Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and has to complete probation in the category of Field Surveyor.

2.3. The present controversy pertains to empowerment of Village Administrative Officer in matters concerning transfer of patta. Patta transfer involves two categories i.e., (i) Full field transfer and (ii) Part field transfer. From time immemorial, the procedure is that the Firka Surveyor shall prepare subdivision records based on enjoyment, enquiry, and based on the chain of documents for effective sub division.

2.4. The post of Firka Surveyor is deputed to Taluk Offices for maintaining land revenue records. A Firka Surveyor is obligated to bring post-survey changes in occupation and registry up to date as it is the very basis of revenue administration. The subdivision work is the primary and sole duty of Firka Surveyor in the maintenance wing. The duties and responsibilities have been formulated in various rules, orders etc., and the same had been affirmed by the Director of Survey & Settlement /2nd respondent herein in Circular No.K3/41559/87 (Survey) dated 15.05.1989.

2.5. The first respondent, vide Lr.(Ms.)No.497 dated 26.12.2018, has issued a clarification letter to the second respondent stating that the Village Administrative Officer may also be allowed to participate in the request for measurement of field involving subdivision for transfer of names of the Pattadar during field inspection of Firka Surveyor and the Village Administrative Officer should be given the date of field inspection of the Firka Surveyor. A consequential order has been issued by the first respondent dated 03.01.2019 to the second respondent stating that Tahsildar should consider the objections of the Village Administrative Officers at the time of field inspection and while passing orders, a copy of the Town Survey Land Records should be marked to Village Administrative Officers and the second respondent was directed to give necessary instructions to the concerned in this regard.

2.6. The job of a Surveyor is technical and only qualified persons will be able to handle it. A Firka Surveyor's post is promotional in nature and is equivalent to the post of Assistant Revenue Inspector. The educational and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top