JUDGMENT :

SHAMEEM AKTHER, J.

1. Since the facts of the case and the issue involved in both these writ appeals are similar and since both these writ appeals arise out of a common order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court, both these writ appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Both these appeals are filed challenging the common order, dated 10.02.2020, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. Nos. 39279 of 2017 and 6761 of 2018.

3. We have heard the submissions of Sri. Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellant in both the appeals: Sri. B. Venkateshwara Rao, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 in W.A. No. 400 of 2020; Sri. R. Sushanth Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No. 8 in W.A. No. 400 of 2020 and respondent No. 9 in W.A. No. 407 of 2020; learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for official respondent Nos. 2 to 7 in W.A. No. 400 of 2020 and official respondent Nos. 4 to 7 in W.A. No. 407 of 2020; Sri. B. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 in W.A. No. 407 of 2020 and Sri. Vivek Jain, learned counsel for respondent No. 8 in W.A. No. 407 of 2020. We have perused the record.

4. The sole appellant in both th