BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
Mani - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police, Trichy & Another - Respondent
Crl.O.P. (MD). No. 9384 of 2022
Decided On : 19-05-2022
Harassment - Police Investigation - The court issued guidelines to prevent harassment by the police during investigation, emphasizing the need for proper summoning procedures and adherence to Supreme Court guidelines on preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought direction to prevent police interference in a civil dispute for money recovery and to stop harassment during the enquiry related to an FIR lodged by the second respondent.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged the petitioner's complaint of harassment by the police and issued guidelines to prevent such harassment during investigation. The court directed the police to complete the enquiry and dispose of the same within four weeks.
Issues: Complaint of police harassment during investigation, interference in civil dispute, and delay in enquiry disposal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to prevent harassment during police investigation and outlined specific guidelines to ensure proper summoning procedures and adherence to Supreme Court guidelines on preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was disposed of with the direction for the police to complete the enquiry and dispose of the same within four weeks.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent police to not to interfere in to the civil dispute for recovery of money and "Not to Harass" the petitioner on the case of enquiry relating to the FIR in Crime No. 69 of 2022 lodged on the complaint of the 2nd respondent)
1. This petition has been filed seeking direction to direct the first respondent police to not to interfere in to the civil dispute for recovery of money and not to harass the petitioner on the case of enquiry relating to the FIR in Crime No. 69 of 2022, which was registered on the complaint of the second respondent.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police harassed the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submits that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending on the file of the respondent police.
4. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent police.
5. It is the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police had been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
6. An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfettered powers of the Investigation Officers so long as the power to investigate/enquire into these offences are legitimately exercised within the frame work of Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the Magistrate to be a guardian in all the stages of the police investigation, there is no power envisaging him to interfere with the actual investigation or the mode of investigation. It is in this background that numerous petitions complaining of harassment are being reported and filed before this Court seeking for directions to refrain the police officials from harassing the persons named in a complaint.
7. This Court, exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code normally would not interfere with the investigation conducted by a police officer. Nevertheless, it would also not turn a blind eye to instances of harassment by the police under the guise of investigation is brought to its notice.
8. In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.
9. In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued:
a) While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation.
b) The respondent police is directed to serve summons mentioning the CSR number, date of complaint and the name of the complainant
c)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station.
d)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation.
e)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to.
10. In view of the above, the first respondent is directed to complete the enquiry and dispose of the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
11. With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
Prevention of harassment during police investigation and the issuance of specific guidelines to ensure proper procedures and adherence to Supreme Court guidelines.
The legitimate exercise of powers by investigation officers within the framework of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the court's authority to address instances of harassment during police investiga....
The Court's inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can be invoked to issue guidelines to prevent harassment by the police during enquiries.
Proper procedures during police enquiry/investigation are essential to prevent harassment, including written summons, recording of enquiry minutes, and adherence to Supreme Court guidelines.
Prevention of harassment by police during enquiry and adherence to guidelines for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Supreme Court.
High Court would not turn a blind eye to instances of harassment by police under guise of investigation when it is brought to its notice.
(1) Enquiry into a non-cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is unfettered powers of Investigating Officers.(2) While summoning any person named in complaint or any witness to incident complaine....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for the police to strictly comply with the legal provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, including the mandatory registration of FIR....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.