Back
M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Loganathan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Inspector of Police, Vellore – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in C.A.No.25 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vellore dated 03.10.2016 confirming the order of conviction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Vellore in C.C.No.393 of 2015 dated 26.04.2016 and set aside the same.)
1. The petitioner/accused in C.C.No.393 of 2015 was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Vellore by judgment dated 26.04.2016 for the offence under section 466 IPC and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Section 468 IPC and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Section 471 IPC and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Section 420 IPC and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and the case must be proved beyond reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution must prove the forgery of a document and the accused's involvement, and the defense's claims must be supported by credible evi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proving beyond reasonable doubt the essential ingredients of the offences punishable under sections 420, 468, and 471 of IPC.
Procedural irregularities in criminal trials can result in quashing convictions if fair trial principles are violated.
The prosecution failed to establish essential elements of forgery and use of a forged document, leading to the appellant's conviction being unsustainable.
The prosecution must establish all elements of the alleged offences beyond a reasonable doubt, and the burden of proof never shifts to the accused. In the absence of credible evidence linking the acc....
Insufficient evidence against certain accused led to their acquittal, while confirming conviction for others with reduced sentences.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the abuse of process of law and the exercise of inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the impugned FIR and all crimi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the burden of proof on the prosecution to establish charges beyond reasonable doubt in cases of forgery under the IPC, and the court's discretion i....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
