SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1808

A. A. NAKKIRAN
R. Jayaprakash – Appellant
Versus
C. Palanisamy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:N. Damodaran, Advocate. For the Respondent:M. Govindaraju, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Appeal Suit has been filed, under Order 41 Rule 1 r/w Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 18.03.2013 made in O.S.No.51 of 2009 on the file of the learned First Additional District Judge, Erode.)

1. This Appeal Suit has been filed, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 18.03.2013 made in O.S.No.51 of 2009 on the file of the learned First Additional District Judge, Erode.

2. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant in O.S.No.51 of 2009 on the file of the learned First Additional District Judge, Erode. The suit was filed for recovery of money with interest and for costs of the suit.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit.

4. The case of the Plaintiff, as set out, in the plaint is that on 06.12.2007, the Defendant has borrowed a sum of Rs.17,00,000/- from Plaintiff for his urgent family and business expenses and he executed the suit promissory note in favour of the Plaintiff on the same day. The Defendant also agreed to repay the same to the Plaintiff on his demand, with interest at the rate of 12% per annum per hundred. Inspite of re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top