SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1881

N. SATHISH KUMAR
Sankar – Appellant
Versus
Shiek Ansar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Devaraj, Advocate. For the Respondent: No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for records and quash the CC No.132 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Kallakuruchi.)

This petition has been filed to call for the records in C.C. No.132 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Kallakuruchi and quash the proceedings initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The only ground raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the cheque was dated in the year 2018 for the debt issued in the year 2013. Therefore, it is the contention of the petitioner that the time barred claim is not a legally enforceable debt. In support of his contention, the learned counsel relied upon the judgment of this Court in 2019 STPL 9359 Madras in Crl.O.P.No.17803 of 2014 dated 07.03.2019 in Insulation House., Rep. by Meenakshi Davey and others v. Pramod Kumar Daga.

3. The learned single Judge who has passed the above jugement reling upon the other judgment of this Court in Sama Dharman and Another vs. S. Natarajan in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3824 of 2012 dated 25.07.2012. It is also relevant to note that challenging the above order an appeal was fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top