Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Dheeraj Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
Sachin – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed under section 138 ni act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the time-bar issue of the debt. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court analysis on debt enforceability and presumption. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER :
(DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL, J.)
This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashment of complaint case number S.C.N.I.A./3912/2019 (Sachin Vs. Dheeraj) registered under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1881”) against the petitioner filed on behalf of respondent Sachin Jain.
2. Respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 against the petitioner arraigning him as accused with an averment that he borrowed Rs.5,60,000/- from him on various dates between a period from 31.10.2014 to 03.04.2015. He made entries of the aforesaid amount in a diary. When complainant was in need of money, he asked the accused to return the money. The petitioner assured respondent to return the amount soon and in that regard he issued a cheque of an amount of Rs.5,60,000/- dated 02.03.2019 of Corporation Bank, Branch Gopal
A debtor's issuance of a cheque acknowledges a debt; questions of enforceability or time-bar must be determined through evidence, not prior to trial.
The legal enforceability of a debt, including whether it is time-barred, is a question of fact requiring trial evidence, and cannot be quashed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
The legal enforceability of debt, time-barred debt, and the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act are disputed questions of fact, requiring evidence and trial to determine, and should not be de....
The nature of the debt must be proven during trial, and there is a presumption in favor of the holder of the cheque.
Dishonour of cheque – Cheque itself is a promise to pay even if debt is barred by time.
The issue of whether a cheque was issued for a time-barred debt is a matter for evidence and cannot be adjudicated before the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
