SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Dheeraj Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
Sachin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
For the Petitioner: Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava
For the Respondent: Shri Utkarsh Agrawal

ORDER :

(DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL, J.)

This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashment of complaint case number S.C.N.I.A./3912/2019 (Sachin Vs. Dheeraj) registered under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1881”) against the petitioner filed on behalf of respondent Sachin Jain.

2. Respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 against the petitioner arraigning him as accused with an averment that he borrowed Rs.5,60,000/- from him on various dates between a period from 31.10.2014 to 03.04.2015. He made entries of the aforesaid amount in a diary. When complainant was in need of money, he asked the accused to return the money. The petitioner assured respondent to return the amount soon and in that regard he issued a cheque of an amount of Rs.5,60,000/- dated 02.03.2019 of Corporation Bank, Branch Gopal Ganj, Sagar bearing cheque No.227345. The cheque issued by the petitioner was presented by the respondent in his State Bank account Gujarati Bajar Branch, Sagar on 20.03.2019, but the same was dishonored on account of funds insufficient. Eventually, a notice under Section 138 of the Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top