BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
S. Rambabu - Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli & Others - Respondent
W.P(MD). No. 12379 of 2022
Decided On : 16-06-2022
Writ Petition - Permission for Public Event - The court set aside the rejection of permission for conducting a public event in light of Independence Day and a memorial day, emphasizing the importance of encouraging such events and providing necessary police protection.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought permission to conduct a public event in celebration of Independence Day and a memorial day. The permission was rejected by the police citing potential traffic problems and accidents on the National Highway.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rejection of permission lacked a valid reason and emphasized the importance of encouraging such events, especially in the context of national celebrations.
Issues: Permission for public event, rejection by police, potential traffic problems
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to support and encourage public events in the context of national celebrations and set aside the rejection of permission, directing the police to provide necessary protection for the event.
Final Decision: The court set aside the rejection of permission and directed the police to provide necessary protection for the public event.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to order dated 15.06.2022 vide proceedings Nil passed by the third respondent and quash the same as illegal consequently direct the respondents herein to grant permission for conducting Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam starts from Bharathiyar Statue Tirunelveli Junction and ends at Vachinathan Memoraial Hall situated a Vanchi Maniyachi in the light of Thiyagi Vanchinathan Memorital Day and 75th Year Independence Day Celebration on 17.06.2022 from 06.30 a.m. to 10.00 a.m.)
1. This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to order dated 15.06.2022 vide proceedings Nil passed by the third respondent and quash the same as illegal consequently, direct the respondents herein to grant permission for conducting Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam starts from Bharathiyar Statue Tirunelveli Junction and ends at Vachinathan Memoraial Hall situated a Vanchi Maniyachi in the light of Thiyagi Vanchinathan Memorital Day and 75th Year Independence Day Celebration on 17.06.2022 from 06.30 a.m. to 10.00 a.m.
2. Mr.M.Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is proposed to celebrate 75th year Independence Day and Thiyagi Vanchinathan Memorial Day. In pursuance of that memorial, they are organizing several programmes and one of the programmes is Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam, which starts from Bharathiyar Statue, Tirunelveli Junction to Vachinathan Memorial Hall situated at Vanchi Maniyachi, in which, several social activities and freedom fighters and other Legislative Members are proposed to participate and pay tribute to the freedom fighter Vanchinathan. In this regard, the petitioner gave representation on 20.05.2022 seeking permission for conducting Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam scheduled to be held on 16.06.2022 and 17.06.2022. But the third respondent police, by the impugned order dated 15.06.2022 rejected the representation. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that there will be a traffic problem and possibilities of accidents, since the proposed Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam is on the National Highway and schools are opened recently.
5. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. On perusal of records, it is seen that the petitioner is organizing to conduct several programmes in view of 75th Year Independence Day and Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam starts from Bharathiyar Statue, Tirunelveli Junction to Vachinathan Memorial Hall situated at Vanchi Maniyachi, for which, permission has been sought by the petitioner from the third respondent and the same was rejected.
7. I have perused the impugned order passed by the third respondent. The permission was rejected by the third respondent on the ground that if Thiya Jothi Thodar Ootam is permitted, there will be a traffic conjunction and possibilities of accidents in the Highways. The reason given in the impugned order is not acceptable one. Apart from this reason, there is no valid reason assigned by the third respondent in the impugned order for rejecting the permission.
8. The petitioner being the citizen of India, is organizing to conduct many programmes in remember of Thiyagi Vanchinathan in view of 75th year Independence day. The respondent police ought to have encourage the petitioner instead of rejecting the permission without assign any valid reason. The Central and State Government
Encouraging public events in the context of national celebrations and providing necessary police protection.
The court emphasized that while the police cannot restrict religious processions arbitrarily, concerns about potential law and order issues can justify such restrictions, especially in cases motivate....
Fundamental rights to conduct cultural programmes and processions must be upheld unless substantively justified by law enforcement concerns.
The court's decision was based on the circular issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, which influenced the consideration of the petitioner's representation for conducting 'Annathanam' ....
The court's decision was influenced by the circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, which formed the basis for directing the second respondent to consider the representation ....
The court balanced the cultural significance of the event with the need to prevent unlawful activities, ultimately granting permission with specific conditions.
A writ of mandamus can be issued directing authorities to grant permission for a religious festival notwithstanding a private dispute between community groups.
The court's decision was influenced by the circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, which provided the framework for considering applications seeking permission for cultural ....
Courts may allow festival celebrations when imposing conditions to maintain communal harmony and law and order.
Administrative authorities are directed to permit customary cultural or religious programs provided they do not violate public order, and they must prescribe reasonable conditions to manage safety an....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.