SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1963

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S. RAMESH, J.
N.Thiyagarajan - Appellant
Versus
The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Kumbakonam & Another - Respondent
W.P. (MD). No. 12392 of 2022
Decided On : 20-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Anandha Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: K. Jagadees Balan, Standing counsel.

The duty of the respondent Corporation to pay terminal benefits on the date of retirement and the justification for payment of penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum due to belated disbursement of retirement benefits.

Headnote:

Interest - Retirement Benefits - The court directed the respondent Corporation to pay penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits from the date of retirement until the date of actual disbursement, with a time frame of three months for payment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the belated payment of retirement benefits, including Provident Fund, Gratuity, and EL Encashment Salary.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the belated disbursement of retirement benefits had caused serious prejudice to the retired employee, justifying the payment of penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement until the date of actual disbursement.

Issues: The issue revolved around the petitioner's claim for interest on the belated payment of retirement benefits and the respondent Corporation's request for an extended time frame for payment due to revenue loss caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondent Corporation was duty-bound to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself, and the belated disbursement had caused serious prejudice to the retired employee, justifying the payment of penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was partly allowed, and the respondents were directed to pay the interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the belated payment of petitioner's retirement benefits including, Provident Fund, Gratuity, EL Encashment Salary amount within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.)

1. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. Aggrieved against the belated settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner, he has claimed interest on the belated payment in this Writ Petition.

3. In identical issues, this Court has passed various orders, justifying the payment of interest to the aggrieved pensioners and in the order dated 13.12.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.26481 of 2019, the following order came to be passed:-

“5.I am not in agreement with the said representation made. There was already a duty cast on the respondent Corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself and the very fact that the belated disbursement of retirement benefit, had already put the retired employee to serious prejudice, entertaining the present request for disbursement of the interest on the belated payment in installments, could cause further prejudice to the retired employee.

6. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondent /Corporation to pay the penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits for the period from the date of the retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, not before the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

4. This Court is of the view that the respondents could be directed to pay the interest on the belated payment, at the rate of 6% per annum, as ordered in the above Writ Petition.

5. At this juncture, Mr.K.Jagadees Balan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation would submit that owing to the Covid-19 pandemic situation and non-plying of buses for a considerable time, there has been a heavy revenue loss for the Corporation and therefore, the period of payment spread over three months as, ordered in the earlier Writ Petition, can be extended, so as to enable them to pay the interest amount, within a period of six months.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner also does not have any objections to the same.

7. In this background, there shall be a direction to the respondents to pay the interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits, commencing from the date of retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. This Writ Petition stands partly allowed in accordance with the above terms. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top