SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2763

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S. RAMESH, J.
P. Arikrishnan - Appellant
Versus
The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Ltd., Represented by its General Manager, Thirunelveli - Respondent
W.P. (MD)No. 19177 of 2022
Decided On : 22-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Arunachalam, Advocate. For the Respondent: D. Jebaraj, Standing Counsel.

The duty to pay terminal benefits on the date of retirement and the serious prejudice caused by belated disbursement justified the payment of interest on the belated payment.

Headnote:

Interest - Terminal Benefits - The court directed the respondent to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the petitioner's retirement benefits, justifying the payment of interest to the aggrieved pensioners.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the delay in paying the amounts towards the petitioner's terminal benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the belated settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner justified the payment of interest, and directed the respondent to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Issues: The issue was the delay in the settlement of the petitioner's terminal benefits and the claim for interest on the belated payment.

Ratio Decidendi: The duty was cast on the respondent Corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself, and the belated disbursement of retirement benefits had put the retired employee to serious prejudice, justifying the payment of interest on the belated payment.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, and the respondent was directed to pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 6 percentage per annum for the period of delay from 01.09.19 to 24.01.2021 in paying the amounts paid towards the petitioner's terminal benefits namely EPF Employee's Contribution, Gratuity and Encashment of leave within a time frame fixed by this Court.)

1. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. Aggrieved against the belated settlement of the terminal benefits to the petitioner, he has claimed interest on the belated payment in this Writ Petition.

3. In identical issues, this Court has passed various orders, justifying the payment of interest to the aggrieved pensioners and in the order dated 13.12.2019 in W.P.(MD) No.26481 of 2019, the following order came to be passed:-

“5.I am not in agreement with the said representation made. There was already a duty cast on the respondent Corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself and the very fact that the belated disbursement of retirement benefit, had already put the retired employee to serious prejudice, entertaining the present request for disbursement of the interest on the belated payment in installments, could cause further prejudice to the retired employee.

6. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondent /Corporation to pay the penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits for the period from the date of the retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, not before the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

4. This Court is of the view that the respondent could be directed to pay the interest on the belated payment, at the rate of 6% per annum, as ordered in the above Writ Petition.

5. At this juncture, Mr.D.Jebaraj, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation would submit that owing to the Covid-19 pandemic situation and non-plying of buses for a considerable time, there has been a heavy revenue loss for the Corporation and therefore, the period of payment spread over three months as, ordered in the earlier Writ Petition, can be extended, so as to enable them to pay the interest amount, within a period of six months.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner also does not have any objections to the same.

7. In this background, there shall be a direction to the respondent to pay the interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits, commencing from the date of retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. This Writ Petition stands allowed in accordance with the above terms. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top