IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
Anitha R. Radhakrishnan - Appellant
Versus
B. Ramkumar Adityan - Respondent
O.A.Nos. 560, 561 & 562 of 2021 in E.L.P.No. 17 of 2016
Decided On : 24-06-2022
RP Act - Election Petition - Sections 80, 80A, 81, 83, 84, 100(1)(d)(i), 125A - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
The applicant, a successful returned candidate from No.215, Tiruchendur Assembly Constituency, was challenged in an election petition for insufficient disclosure of educational qualification and incomplete information of criminal antecedents. The applicant contended that the election petition had become infructuous due to the end of the old assembly term and fresh elections.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the election petition did not disclose any cause of action and was liable to be dismissed as infructuous due to the end of the old assembly term and the holding of fresh elections.
Issues: Allegation of corrupt practice, dismissal of election petition as infructuous
Ratio Decidendi: An election petition without material facts relating to a corrupt practice is not valid. Once the charge of corrupt practice fails, the election petition is rendered infructuous due to the end of the old assembly term and the holding of fresh elections.
Final Decision: The original applications were allowed, and the election petition was dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGMENT
These original applications have been filed for the following relief:
(i) O.A.No.560 of 2021 to strike off Paragraph Nos.7 to 27 & 29 in the Election Petition No.17 / 2016 as unnecessary, frivolous, vexatious and not existing or surviving as on this date, in view of the applicant's term as Returned Candidate from No.215, Tiruchendur Constituency has come to an end due to the General Tamil Nadu State Assembly Election held in the month of 6th April, 2021.
(ii) O.A.No.561 of 2021 to reject the Election Petition No.17 of 2016 filed by the petitioner and consequently, dismiss the same.
(iii) O.A.No.562 of 2021 to dismiss E.L.P.No.17 of 2016 as infructuous in view of 16th General Election held for Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly including for the Tiruchendur Assembly Constituency on 6th April, 2021.
For the sake of convenience, the array of parties in the original applications have been adopted.
2. The first respondent / election petitioner has filed ELP No.17 of 2016 under Sections 80, 80A, 81, 83, 84, 100 (1)(d)(i), 125A of Representation of Peoples Act 1951 [in short “RP Act”], Rules 4, 4A, 8 and 10 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 to declare that election of the returned candidate, namely the applicant herein from No.215, Tiruchendur Legislative Assembly Constituency, Thoothukudi District, Tamil Nadu held on 16.05.2016, in which results have been declared on 19.05.2016, as void.
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE
3. The applicant was elected from No.215, Tiruchendur Assembly Constituency in the 15th General Assembly Election held on 16.05.2016 and he was declared as a successful returned candidate from the said Constituency on 19.05.2016. The first respondent/election petitioner, being a voter and a Law Graduate, has filed the present election petition questioning the acceptance of the applicant's nomination dated 25.04.2016 by the Returning Officer of Tiruchendur Assembly Constituency on the following two grounds:
(i) Insufficient disclosure of educational qualification and
(ii) Incomplete information of criminal antecedents.
4. The brief case of the applicant, as averred in the affidavit filed in support of O.A.No.560 of 2021, are as follows:
4.1. The applicant was sponsored by the political party “Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam” as a candidate to contest the election from No.215, Tiruchendur Assembly Constituency in the election scheduled on 16.05.2016. The applicant filed duly filled nomination by furnishing necessary details along with the affidavit in Form No.26, as per the directive of the Election Commission of India.
4.2. The nomination filed by the applicant on 25.04.2016 was taken up by the Returning Officer of Tiruchendur Constituency for scrutiny on 30.04.2016, along with the nominations filed by other candidates. The Returning Officer, after verifying the contents disclosed by the applicant in the affidavit filed in Form No.26 filed along with the nomination, accepted the nomination.
4.3. According to the applicant, he has clearly disclosed and revealed the details of the criminal cases pending against him in the appropriate columns stipulated in Clause 5(i)(a) 4 cases, 5(i)(b) 4 cases, 5(i)(c) 4 cases in Form 26 Affidavit, which is sufficient for the voters of Tiruchendur Assembly Constituency, to know about the details of criminal antecedents of the applicant. According to the applicant, in the affidavit in Form 26, he has furnished the following criminal cases in Crime Nos.4/06, 67/2011, 185/2011 and 187/2011, which are pending at different stages before the Principal District Judge Court and Special Court for trial of MP/MLA cases in SC.Nos.3/2019, 139/2019, 14/2019 and 140/2019.
4.4. According to the applicant, he has fairly disclosed all the details of criminal cases in the nomination form filed on 25.04.2016 and contested the election held on 16.05.2016 and successful in the election and th
An election petition without material facts relating to a corrupt practice is not valid, and once the charge of corrupt practice fails, the election petition is rendered infructuous due to the end of....
Allegations of corrupt practice in an election petition must be supported by specific material facts and full particulars as required by Section 83 of the RP Act of 1951. Failure to plead such materi....
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
An election petition must contain concise material facts and particulars as per the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951; failure to do so results in dismissal.
Non-joinder of a candidate accused of corrupt practices in an election petition results in its mandatory dismissal under Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding material facts and submission of integral documents renders an election petition dismissible at the threshold.
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.