NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Rahul Vasudevbhai Vyas – Appellant
Versus
Hemang Yogeshbhai Joshi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J.
1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. N.D. Nanavaty with learned Advocate Mr. Mitul Shelat and learned Advocate Ms. Disha Nanavaty on behalf of the applicant- original respondent no.1 and party-in-person-Mr. Rahul Vasudevbhai Vyas for himself as the respondent no.1- original petitioner and learned Advocate Mr. Sahil M. Shah with learned Advocate Mr. Taukib M. Mandli for respondents no.2 and 3 - original respondents no.2 and 3. [The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status in the Election Petition].
2. By way of this application under Order VII Rule 11 (c) (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Sections 81, 82, 83 and 84 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as ‘The RP Act, 1951” for short ) the respondent no.1 has prayed that this Court may reject election petition preferred by the original petitioner -party-in-person.
2.1 Briefly stated, the original petitioner and respondent no. 1 had contested elections to the Lok Sabha in the Vadodara- 20 constituency, which was held on 07.05.2024. The applicant-original respondent no. 1 had secured the highest number of votes and had been declared as elected,
Ashraf Kokkur vs. K.V. Abdul Khader etc. reported in 2015(1) SCC 129
K.K. Ramchandran Master vs. M.V. Sreyamskumar & Ors. reported in 2010 (7) SCC 428
Mangani Lal Mandal vs. Bishnu Deo Bhandari reported in 2012(3) SCC 314
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. vs. Owners and Parties Vessel MV. Fortune Express
Ram Sukh vs. Dinesh Aggrawal reported in 2009 (10) SCC 541
Virender Nath Gautam vs. Satpal Singh reported in 2007(3) SCC 617
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
An election petition must contain concise material facts and particulars as per the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951; failure to do so results in dismissal.
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
Allegations of corrupt practice in an election petition must be supported by specific material facts and full particulars as required by Section 83 of the RP Act of 1951. Failure to plead such materi....
An election petition may be rejected if it fails to comply with mandatory pleading requirements regarding concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices as per the Represen....
Election petitions must contain precise and material facts, especially concerning alleged corrupt practices, as mandated by Section 83 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.
Failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding material facts and submission of integral documents renders an election petition dismissible at the threshold.
The Election Petition must contain a concise statement of material facts and full particulars of any alleged corrupt practice, and demonstrate how the result of the election was materially affected b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.