SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2050

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, J.
M/s. Sharoff Steel Traders, Rep. by Partner Anil Kumar Agarwal, Bangalore - Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Roving Squad, Vellore & Another - Respondent
WP. Nos. 14811 & 14813 of 2022 & WMP Nos. 14009 & 14010 of 2022
Decided On : 14-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:D. Vijayakumar, Advocate. For Respondents: C. Harsha Raj, Additional Government Pleader.

Section 129(1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, provides for the detention, seizure, and release of goods in transit, and outlines the conditions for the release of detained goods, including the remittance of penalty amounts.

Headnote:

Detention - Goods in Transit - Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Section 129

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought release of goods detained for discrepancies in shipment and accompanying documents. The assessing authority rejected their objections and proposed penalties, prompting the petitioners to seek provisional release of goods.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioners to furnish bank guarantees for the proposed penalty amounts, as per Section 129(1) of the Act, for the release of the goods.

Issues: Discrepancies in goods shipment, rejection of objections, proposed penalties, and release of detained goods.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 129(1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, which provides for the detention, seizure, and release of goods in transit, and directed the petitioners to furnish bank guarantees for the penalty amounts for the release of the goods.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petitions, directing the petitioners to furnish bank guarantees for the penalty amounts and ordering the release of the goods. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

JUDGMENT

(Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent proceedings in GD Nos.68/2022-23 and GD Nos.69/2022-23 dated 01.06.2022 respectively and quash the same being illegal, invalid, without jurisdiction and violated the principles of natural justice and contrary to the law and direct the respondent to release the consignment in Vehicle No.NL 01 K7719 and Vehicle No.NL 01 AB 2149 as per the petitioner representation dated 28.05.2022.)

Common Order

1. Mr.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents and has received instructions to enable final disposal of these Writ Petitions even at the stage of admission.

2. The petitioners had conveyed goods under vehicles bearing No.NL 01 K 7719 in WP.No.14811 of 2022 and No.NL 01 AB 2149, in WP.No.14813 of 2022. The vehicles had been intersected and upon verification of the documents, the respondents claim to have found various discrepancies in the shipment of the goods and the documents accompanying the consignments.

3. Orders of detention have been passed on 24.05.2022 in both cases, proposing penalty for the non-compliances noted therein. The details of the same are not referred to as they are not relevant to decide the question of relief sought. Penalty has been computed in the case of the petitioner in WP.No.14811 of 2022, at a figure of Rs.9,15,924/- and in the case of the petitioner in WP.No.14813 of 2022, at a figure of Rs.9,49,678/-.

4. The petitioners had admittedly, filed objections to the proposals contained in the show cause notice on 31.05.2022, which the assessing authority rejects in the impugned notices dated 01.06.2022. The procedure followed by the authority does not appear to be in order insofar as, though styled as 'notices', the officer has proceeded to reject the arguments of the petitioners, effectively passing orders adverse to interests of the petitioners.

5. Be that as it may, Mr.Harsha, would submit that orders are in the pipeline and will be passed expeditiously. All that remains as far as the present writ petitions are concerned, is as regards the release of the goods on a provisional basis and subject to statutory conditions.

6. The impugned notices, proceed on the basis that the penalty proposed is liable to be confirmed and call upon the petitioners to remit the amounts of penalty, within three (3) days from date of receipt of the notices under threat of action under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short 'Act') dealing with confiscation of goods or conveyances and levy of penalty.

7. The petitioner is willing to furnish bank guarantees equivalent to the amount of penalty quantified by the authority under show cause notices/impugned notices dated 24.05.2022 / 01.06.2022 respectively to obtain release of the goods. In such an event, all that remains is for the authority to release the goods in terms of Section 129 of the Act, if the condition set out therein, stands satisfied.

8. Section 129 reads as follows:

129. Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit:

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure, shall be released,––

a. on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to one hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to two per cent. of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty;

b. o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top