IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, LAPITA BANERJI, JJ.
Fayiz Nangaparambill – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-13130 of 2023
Decided On : 15-01-2024
JUDGMENT
Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, J. (Oral)
Challenge in the present Writ petition, filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the detention order in Form GST MOV-06 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.3 under Section 129(1) of the Haryana Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.
2. The following order was passed on 05.07.2023:
3. State Counsel has placed on record the photocopy of order dated 21.07.2023 wherein the deposit of Rs. 6,22,250/- has been made on 08.07.2023 by the petitioner being the proprietor of M/s N.P. Traders. The goods being areca nuts (supari) have been released and handed over to authorized persons. The release order dated 08.07.2023 has also been placed on record apart from the fact that an order has already been passed on 30.05.2023 imposing the penalty on the ground that the petitioner-firm was not involved in the business of areca nuts and that both the firms were not involved in the business of supply of areca nuts but were engaged in the business of stationary items etc.
4. In such circumstances, once the authorities have already passed the order as per the statutory provisions it would be open to the petitioner to avail his statutory remedy of appeal under the provisions of the Act. The Apex Court in The State of Punjab v. Shiv Enterprises & others, 2023 (96) GST 120 held that it is not for this Court to entertain the Writ petitions against the show cause notice issued.
5. Keeping in view the above, we dispose of the present Writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from today.
The court will not entertain writ petitions against show cause notices, emphasizing the necessity of pursuing statutory remedies as per the relevant tax laws.
The appellate authority must consider all objections raised by the petitioner regarding the nature of goods to ensure lawful detention and imposition of tax.
Natural justice requirements necessitate notice to affected parties; however, notice to the driver suffices, supporting reliance on alternative statutory remedies for contesting orders.
The existence of an alternate remedy under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act precludes the maintainability of a writ petition challenging penalties imposed.
Section 129 forms part of the machinery provisions under the Act to check evasion of tax and a detention can be justified only if there is a contravention of the provisions of the Act in relation to ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.