SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2076

K. KUMARESH BABU
C. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Akbar Ali – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel for P. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 11.01.2016, made in I.A.No.171 of 2015 in O.S.No.157 of 2014 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Court at Krishnagiri.)

The instant Revision Petition has been filed by the defendants in the suit in O.S.No.157 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Sub-ordinate Judge,  Krishnagiri, wherein, the application filed by the petitioner in Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C., to reject the plaint has been dismissed.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he had purchased properties under four sale deeds dated 27.02.2012 from the respondents. It was an agreement between the parties to this petition that if the respondents herein paid a sum of Rs.75,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Lakhs) within a period of five months, then the petitioner will reconvey the lands. However, the respondents herein started to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the property which insisted him to initiate O.S.Nos.222 & 223 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri, praying for a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top