Back
T. RAJA, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
L. Jayakumar – Appellant
Versus
Central Bank of India, Rep. by its General Manager, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order dated 20.10.2014 passed in W.P.No.17177 of 2011 by the learned Single Judge of this Court.) T. Raja, J.
1. Unsuccessful appellant has brought this appeal challenging the correctness of the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.17177 of 2011, dated 20.10.2014.
2. It is the claim of the appellant before the learned Single Judge that the respondent bank refused to pay the arrears of legal fees and remuneration to a sum of Rs.26,42,615/- along with interest. Therefore, he filed W.P.No.17177 of 2011 seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent bank to pay the above said payment. Learned Single Judge refused to accept the said prayer of the writ petitioner/appellant. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant/writ petitioner has filed the present writ appeal.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is an Advocate and Senior Member in the Bar having practice in the Madras High Court for over 36 years. He was in the panel of Advocates nearly 36 years in most of the nationalized banks and corporate including Centr
Disputed contract terms should be adjudicated by the Civil Court, not through a writ petition.
Public sector banks must adhere to principles of fairness and non-arbitrariness in their dealings, as established under Article 14 of the Constitution.
An allegation of collusion must be specifically averred with details and proved. Although it is apparent that the defendant no. 2 admitted to the claim made by the plaintiff, the evidence led by the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitation of the Arbitrator's powers, the calculation of arbitration costs, and the recovery fee under the rules, and the court's emphasis on ....
Point of law: In appropriate cases, the courts may consider ordering prosecution otherwise it may not be possible to maintain purity and sanctity of judicial proceedings.
A party which is in possession of the evidence, does not produce it, despite specific orders of the Civil Courts, adverse inference against such party ought to be drawn in favour of the other party.
(1) Recovery of debt – A person whose case is based on falsehood has no right to approach Court and he can be summarily thrown out at any stage of litigation. (2) Debts Recovery Tribunal shall not en....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
