BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. SRIMATHY, J.
T. Chinna Nadar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No. 18135 of 2019
Decided On : 10-07-2023
Mandamus - Pay Scale Revision - G.O.Ms.No.62, Finance (CMPC) Department, dated 09.03.2015 - G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 22.03.1993 - G.O.Ms.No.234, School Education (G) Department, dated 10.09.2009 - G.O.Ms.No.210, School Education (G.1) Department, dated 14.08.2009 - G.O.Ms.No.190, School Education (G1) Department, dated 12.07.2010 - G.O.Ms.No.146, School Education (G1) Department, dated 19.06.2012 - G.O.Ms.No.300, Education, Science and Technology Department, dated 07.04.1994 - G.O.Ms.No.207, School Education (G2) Department, dated 30.09.2008 - G.O.Ms.No.230, School Education (G1) Department, dated 10.08.2010 - G.O.Ms.No.179, School Education (Elementary2) Department, dated 06.09.2013 - G.O.Ms.No.180, School Education (S.E. 3(1)) Department, dated 06.09.2013 - G.O.Ms.No.181, School Education (S.E.3(1)) Department - W.P.(MD) No. 3186 of 2016 - W.P.(MD) No.3187 of 2016 - W.A. (MD) No. 312 / 2011 - Rev.Appl.No. 227 of 2015 - 2017(1) CWC 561
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Physical Education Teacher, sought a writ of Mandamus to re-fix his pay scale and pension as per G.O.Ms.No.62, Finance (CMPC) Department, dated 09.03.2015. The respondents opposed, citing the inapplicability of the G.O. to the petitioner and the petitioner's belated claim.
Finding of the Court:
The Court dismissed the writ petition, citing the petitioner's belated claim, ineligibility for benefits under G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 22.03.1993, and the cutoff date prescribed by a previous Full Bench order.
Issues: Belated claim, ineligibility for benefits, and the cutoff date prescribed by a previous Full Bench order.
Ratio Decidendi: Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained. The benefits as directed by the Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court and no fresh writ petitions would be entertained after a specified cutoff date.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was not entitled to any benefits. No costs were awarded.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to re-fix the petitioner''s scale of pay as Rs.8000-272-13500 instead of Rs.5900-200-9900 as on 01.01.1996 and subsequent increments and refix his pension and award monetary benefits to him with effect from 01.03.2017 as per G.O.Ms.No.62, (Finance (CMPC) Department), dated 09.03.2015, on par with similarly placed persons.)
1. This writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to re-fix the petitioner''s scale of pay as Rs.8000-272-13500 instead of Rs.5900-200-9900 as on 01.01.1996 and subsequent increments and refix his pension and award monetary benefits to him with effect from 01.03.2017 as per G.O.Ms.No.62 Finance (CMPC) Department, dated 09.03.2015, on par with similarly placed persons.
2. The petitioner was appointed as Physical Education Teacher in the Government High School, Eraviputhoor, Kanyakumari District on 24.01.1972. The petitioner was transferred to the Meenakshipuram, Kanyakumari District, on 01.01.1982 and attained superannuation on 31.07.2002. The petitioner was placed under the scale of pay equal to the Secondary Grade teachers in Middle Schools and rendered service of 29 years. On completion of 10 years of service, the petitioner was granted Selection Grade of pay with effect from 15.02.1983. On completion of 20 years of service, the petitioner was placed on Special Grade of pay with effect from 15.02.1993 on par with Secondary Grade Teachers. Prior to 01.06.1988, the scale of pay for the Secondary Grade Teachers / Physical Education Teachers i.e., Special Teachers, and the Headmasters of Primary Schools were identical i.e., Rs.610-1075/-. Persons who were serving as Headmaster (Primary School) would be given a small additional sum known as "Special Pay".
3. Under the 5th Pay Commission, the State Government brought the Primary School Headmaster as promoted post with separate pay scale i.e. Rs. 1400-2600/- with effect from 01.06.1988. Secondary Grade Teachers / Physical Education Teachers were placed in the pay scale of Rs.1200-2040/-. The government granted the benefits in G.O.Ms.No.216 (Finance (Pay Cell) Department), dated 22.03.1993. However, it was implemented for some persons only. The State Government took the policy decision and awarded revised scale of pay, vide G.O.Ms.No.62, Finance (CMPC) Department, dated 09.03.2015 and refixed the scale of pay to the Secondary Grade Teachers and the Physical Education Teachers as Rs.8000-275-13500/- instead of Rs.5900-200-9900/- as on 01.01.1996. As per G.O.No.62, dated 09.03.2015, the respondents gave subsequent increments on 01.10.1996, 01.10.1997, 01.10.1998 and 01.10.1999 as Rs.8275/-, Rs.8550/-, Rs.8825/- and Rs.9100/- respectively and awarded the same to various Secondary Grade Teachers and Physical Education Teachers. However, it was not implemented to the petitioner inadvertently. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation, dated 04.12.2018, requesting to re-fix. The petitioner approached the Chief Educational Officer to refix. The respondents did not refix the same. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.
4. The respondents have filed a counter affidavit stating that the petitioner is seeking to extend the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.216 (Finance (Pay Cell) Department), dated 22.03.1993. The same cannot be granted, since the issue was considered by the Hon''ble Full Bench of this Court wherein it is clearly stated any person filing writ petition on or after 09.12.2016 are not entitled to the benefits granted under G.O.Ms.No.216 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 22.03.1993. Moreover, the petitioner has slept over all these years, stale and belated claims cannot be entertained. The G.O.Ms.No.62, Finance (CMPC) Department, dated 09.03.2015, was issued by the Government to the persons who are granted benefits under G.O.Ms.No.216 Finance (Pay Cell) Departme
Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained, and benefits as directed by a Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court, with no fresh writ petitions entertained after a spe....
The concept of granting selection grade and special grade should not be tampered with and that teachers are either eligible for promotion or for Selection/Special Grade, not both.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to selection/special grade for government employees is based on stagnation in the same post without promotion for a certain pe....
A Physical Education Teacher is not entitled to salary benefits under G.O.Ms.No.216, which applies only to specific teaching categories, and claims for arrears during service are unjustified due to t....
The main legal point established is the inapplicability of G.O.Ms.No.216 to the petitioner due to delay and laches, and the determination that the petitioner, working in a private aided school, was o....
The court ruled that recovery of higher pay from employees without prior notice and due process violates principles of natural justice, emphasizing the necessity of protecting vested rights.
The court affirmed that benefits under government orders must be uniformly extended to all similarly situated individuals, regardless of their litigation status.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 to the financial benefits of Selection Grade and Special Gra....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that entitlement to selection grade and special grade is subject to completion of requisite years of service, and recovery orders issued within one....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.