SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2452

G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
M. Francis – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:J. Lawrance, Advocate. For the Respondents:Raguvaran Gopalan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of appointment of Selection Grade Supervisor Grade IV (Leather) by the first respondent in Rc.No.14983/E2(3)/2009 dated 12.11.2012 and consequential rejection of Appeal in Na.Ka.No.14983/E2(3)/2009 dated 17.06.2013 by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to grant Selection Grade to the petitioner in the post of Leather Supervisor Grade IV with effect from 26.04.2004 with all consequential benefits within a time stipulated by this Court.)

1. This Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order of appointment of Selection Grade Supervisor Grade IV (Leather) by the first respondent in Rc.No.14983/E2(3)/2009 dated 12.11.2012 and consequential rejection of Appeal in Na.Ka.No.14983/E2(3)/2009 dated 17.06.2013 by the first respondent and consequently directing the first respondent to grant Selection Grade to the petitioner in the post of Leather Supervisor Grade IV with effect from 26.04.2004

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top