SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2530

P. T. ASHA
Satheeswari – Appellant
Versus
K. M. Rajendiran – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties:K. Varadha Kamaraj, K. Vinod, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the Decree and Judgement dated 08.08.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur at Poonamallee.

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the Decree and Judgement dated 08.08.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.256 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur at Poonamallee.)

Common Judgement

1.The two appeals emanate from a single accident involving the rider and the pillion rider of TVS Star two wheeler bearing registration No.TN 20 AB 9054. Though a common Judgement is being pronounced, the facts of each case is herein below extracted separately.

C.M.A.No.626 of 2017:

2. C.M.A.No.626 of 2017 is filed challenging the order passed in M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2008. This petition is filed by the legal representatives of one Mugunthan, who was 27 years old at the time of his death and was working as a Tiles Fitter Mason. Originally this claim petition was filed under Section 163 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, hereinafter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top