IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J.
The National Insurance Company Limited, Nizamabad Branch - Appellant
Vs.
Madaboina Nirmala And Another - Respondents
M.A.C.M.A.Nos.127, 128 and 385 of 2020
Decided On : 23-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the accident and claims filed. (Para 2 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. details of the appeals and parties involved. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by the insurer and claimants. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's analysis of claim maintainability under section 163-a. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court's rationale on the insurer's defences and calculation of compensation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. conclusion and ruling on the compensation awarded. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J.
Since the issues involved in these appeals are one and the same, both the appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The present dispute arises out of a tragic motor accident that occurred on 26/27.10.2023, resulting in death of two brothers, namely, Madaboina Gangaraju, (deceased No.1) and Madaboina Sai Prasad (deceased No.2).
3. M.A.C.M.A.Nos.127 and 128 of 2020 have been filed by the National Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘the insurer’), assailing the awards dated 11.09.2018 passed in O.P.Nos.586 and 587 of 2014 by the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Nizamabad (for short, ‘Tribunal’).
4. M.A.C.M.A. No.385 of 2020 has been preferred by the mother and wife of deceased No.1 (hereinafter referred to as “the claimants”), seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in O.P.No.586 of 2014.
5. Heard Sri N.S.Bhaskar Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant in MACMA No.127 and 128 of 2020 and respondent in MACMA No.385 of 2020 and Sri Ambedkar Sridhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for respondents/claimants in MACMA Nos.127 and 128 of 2020 and appellants in MACMA No.385 of 2020.
Factual matrix (in brief)
6. On the intervening night of 26/27.10.2013, deceased No.1 aged about 29 years, and deceased No.2 aged about 20 years, were travelling on a motorcycle bearing Registration No. AP 25 AN 1810, owned by Panchal Prakash i.e., respondent No.3 in MACMA Nos.127 and 128, proceeding from their native Village Birkur towards Nizamabad. At about 1:15 AM, when the motorcycle reached near Laxmi Medical “X” Road, Pedda Bazar, Nizamabad, an unknown vehicle, driven at high speed in a rash and negligent manner, came from the opposite direction and violently dashed against the motorcycle. The offending vehicle fled the scene immediately after the accident.
7. The impact of the collision was severe, wherein deceased No.2 sustained fatal injuries and died on the spot. Deceased No.1 suffered grievous injuries, including serious head and leg injuries, and was immediately shifted to the Government Hospital, Nizamabad, where he underwent treatment. Despite prolonged medical care, deceased No.1 succumbed to the injuries on 27.03.2014.
8. In respect of the said accident, the Police, Nizamabad, registered Crime No.108 of 2013 under Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the driver of the unknown offending vehicle.
9. The motorcycle bearing No. AP 25 AN 1810 was admittedly insured with the Insurer Company under a comprehensive insurance policy bearing No.35100731126203575040, valid for the period from 30.03.2013 to 29.03.2014, covering the date of the accident.
10. Consequent upon the deaths arising out of the said accident, the legal representatives of the deceased instituted claim petitions. O.P.No.586 of 2014 was filed by the mother and wife of deceased No.1, claiming compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- on account of his death, whereas O.P.No.587 of 2014 was filed by the mother of deceased No.2 alone, claiming compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- for his death.
11. Both claim petitions were tried jointly. The Tribunal by a common judgment dated 11.09.2018 has awarded compensation as under:
i. In O.P.No.586 of 2014, a sum of Rs.5,23,333/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization;
ii. In O.P.No.587 of 2014, a sum of Rs.5,36,667/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of peti
Deepal Girishbhai Soni v. United India Insurance Company Limited
Claims under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act are maintainable for fatalities involving occupants of the insured vehicle, allowing strict statutory liability without proving negligence.
Under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, claimants are not required to prove negligence; the onus lies on the insurer to establish any negligence to deny compensation.
The court upheld the applicability of 'no-fault' liability provisions under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, confirming the Tribunal's compensation award without requiring proof of negligence....
Point of law: liability under Section 163A of the Act is on the owner of the vehicle as a person cannot be both, a claimant as also a recipient and, therefore, the heirs of the owner could not have m....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 163(a) of the MV Act, including the maintainability of claim petitions and the insurer's ability to r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the claimant is not required to plead or establish the wrongful act, neglect, or default of the ....
A claimant must be a third party to maintain a claim under Section 163-A of the M.V. Act; a driver cannot claim compensation for injuries sustained while driving their own vehicle.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of contributory negligence, violation of seating capacity, and the burden of proof under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act in....
Under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, claimants are entitled to compensation without proving the victim's negligence, as legislative intent prioritizes expedited resolution over fault determ....
Under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, compensation must adhere to a structured formula without requiring proof of negligence, with insurance liability confirmed even if the driver lacks a va....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.