ABDUL QUDDHOSE
T. T. Ltd. , Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Mahendra kumar Nahata, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Throught its Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent and thereby quashing the Order No.4/Sec16/06/2017-18 dated 22.02.2018 passed by respondent No.2 and consequently to direct the second respondent to consider the representation in SRN No.G 10671865/05.09.2016 for rectification of company name under Section 16 (1) (b) of the Companies Act, 2013.)
Common Order:
1. These four writ petitions have been filed challenging four different impugned orders all dated 22.02.2018 passed by the second respondent rejecting the petitioner's applications filed under section 16(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 seeking for changing the name of the respective third respondent Company on the ground that the name is identical with or too nearly resembles the petitioner's name.
2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned orders on the following grounds:
(a) Impugned orders, all dated 22.02.2018, have been passed by total non application of mind to section 16(1)(a) of the Companie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.