SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2696

R. N. MANJULA
M. Arulselvan – Appellant
Versus
P. Vijay Anand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:K. Venkatesan, Advocate. For the Respondent:A. Mohamed Ismail, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 20.07.2022 passed in I.A.No.267 of 2022 in O.S.No.6 of 2019 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Palladam.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred challenging the order dated 20.07.2022 passed in I.A.No.267 of 2022 in O.S.No.6 of 2019 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Palladam.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

3. The revision petitioners are the defendants, against whom, the respondent/plaintiff filed the said suit for recovery of money due on promissory note. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioners had filed an interlocutory application in I.A.No.267 of 2022 for sending Exs.A1 and A2 to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad for comparing the disputed signatures of the first defendant on them with the other admitted signatures of the first defendant and get his opinion. The said application was dismissed. Aggrieved over that, the petitioners have preferred this revision petition.

4. The learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top