SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2722

K. MURALI SHANKAR
Suganya – Appellant
Versus
Santhanamurugesan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. M. Benazir Begum, Advocate. For the Respondent: No Appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the case in C.C.No.488 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, and quash the same as illegal.)

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders to call for the records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.488 of 2019 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Dindigul, and quash the same.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.488 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul.

3. The respondent/complainant has filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

4. The case of the prosecution is that since the petitioner's husband was running auction chits and the petitioner was running lodging house in Sirumalai as Vishnu Cottage, the respondent had acquaintence with the petitioner five years prior to the lodging of the complaint, that the petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to meet out the family expenses and for developing the Vishnu Cottage at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top