SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2728

R. N. MANJULA
Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
Arikrishnan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Mitraneshaa for M/S. V. Raghavachari, Advocates. For the Respondent:L.O.M. Magesh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code praying to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 06.02.2017 made in OS.No.56 of 2010 on file of the Principal District Court, Puducherry.)

1. The Appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment of the learned Principal District Judge, dated 06.02.2017 made in OS.No.56 of 2010.

2.The appellant is the defendant, against whom, the respondent/plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance. The said suit was decreed on 06.02.2017. Aggrieved over that this Appeal has been preferred.

3. The Short Facts of the Case, as contained in the plaint are as follows:

The defendant is the owner of the suit property; he agreed to sell the suit property in favour of the plaintiff and executed a sale agreement on 25.06.2007. As per the sale agreement, the sale price was fixed at Rs.21,00,000/- and on the date of the sale agreement itself, the defendant received Rs.20,00,000/- as advance. For receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.1,00,000/- and executing the sale deed nine months'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top