SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2803

G. JAYACHANDRAN
N. Senthil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M. Kalaiselvi Ramanikanth – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Narayana Prasadh, M.N. Bala Krishnan, Advocates. For the Respondent:V. Sivakumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 22.07.2015 made in C.A.No.129 of 2014 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore confirmed the judgment passed in S.T.C.No.310 of 2012 dated 28.08.2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.II, Coimbatore.)

1. The Revision Petitioner is the accused in S.T.C.No.310/2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.II, Coimbatore. In the private complaint filed against the petitioner for dishonouring the cheque issued by him for Rs.5,00,000/-, dated 20/06/2008 to discharge his liability to pay the complainant towards the sale consideration of polythene bags sold and delivered, he was found guilty and convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to undergo 10 months SI and to pay a fine of Rs.4000/- in default, to undergo 2 months SI.

2. Aggreived by the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the trial Court, he preferred an appeal in C.A.No.129 of 2014 before the V Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore and the same came to be dismissed upholding the trial Court judgm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top