Back
M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Rama Vilas Tobacco Company, Represented by its Managing Partner, N. Indirajith, Thanjavur – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trichy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in the Letter No.N.a.2421/2019/A6, dated 14.03.2022 and quash the same as arbitrary illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and forbear the respondents from levying and collecting VAT from the petitioner and further direct the second respondent to refund the sum of Rs.2,05,000/-, which was wrongfully recovered by the second respondent from the petitioner without any valid reason being given to justify the same.)
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition to quash the impugned order, dated 14.03.2022.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is in the business of manufacture of tobacco products and the sale of raw chewing tobacco from the year 1945. Chewing tobacco is made from different dried parts of the tobacco plant. The petitioner filed their monthly returns with the second respondent in the year 2008. On 30.09.2009, in its proceedings in R.C. 2116/07, B1, the second respondent wrongly classified chewing tobacco under Entry 69 of p
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the legal provisions under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, particularly in relation to tax exemptions and t....
Excise - Refunding of central excise duty - Petitioner is to file appropriate application under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944
The court established that the classification of tobacco products relies on the presence of manufacturing activity; absence of such activity necessitates classification as unmanufactured tobacco unde....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the continuity of business in the petitioner's hands, despite the demise of the original dealer, validated the assessment orders made in the n....
Administrative orders must be set aside and remanded for fresh consideration when a material judicial precedent regarding the classification of goods under the GST Act was not available or considered....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the right of the dealer to choose whether to avail the exemption, the applicability of input tax credit benefit, and the prospective nature of s....
The High Court will not exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when an efficacious alternative statutory appellate remedy is available, particularly where the merits of the case c....
The principles of natural justice must be strictly adhered to in quasi-judicial proceedings; failure to do so renders punitive actions void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
