IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.
Subiramani - Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by its The Inspector of Police, Tiruvarur - Respondent
Crl.R.C.(MD) No. 675 of 2022
Decided On : 17-08-2022
Criminal Revision - Interim Custody of Seized Vehicle - The court allowed the revision petition and ordered the return of the seized vehicle to the petitioner for interim custody, subject to specified conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of a seized vehicle used for transporting illegal substances, sought the return of the vehicle. The lower court had dismissed the petition for the return of the vehicle.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was the owner of the vehicle and that keeping the vehicle in custody would lead to its deterioration in value. As no confiscation order had been passed, the court allowed the revision petition and ordered the return of the vehicle to the petitioner for interim custody.
Issues: Ownership of the seized vehicle, deterioration of the vehicle's value in custody, pending confiscation proceedings, and conditions for granting interim custody.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the ownership of the vehicle, the potential deterioration of its value in custody, and the absence of a confiscation order in reaching its decision to grant interim custody to the petitioner.
Final Decision: The Criminal Revision Petition was allowed, and the order dismissing the petition for the return of the seized vehicle was set aside. The vehicle was ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody, subject to specified conditions.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the order, dated 09.06.2022 made in Cr.M.P.No.2688 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur and set aside the order and direct the respondent herein to grant the interim custody of the vehicle viz., Maruti Swift Dzire bearing Registration No.TN-94-V-3137, which has been seized by the respondent herein in Crime No.203 of 2022, dated 01.05.2022.)
1. This Criminal Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur, in Cr.M.P.No.2688 of 2022 in Crime No.203 of 2022, dated 09.06.2022.
2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the vehicle/Maruti Swift Dzire bearing Registration No.TN-94-V-3137. On 01.05.2022, the respondent police seized the vehicle viz., Maruti Swift Dzire bearing Registration No.TN-94- V-3137 in Crime No.203 of 2022 as the same was used for transporting 150 kgs of ganja and the same were remanded in R.P.R.No.97 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur.
3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has approached the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur, for returning of the said vehicle in Crl.M.P.No.2668 of 2022 and the learned Additional District Judge, vide order dated 09.06.2022, has dismissed the petition. Challenging the dismissal order, the above Criminal Revision came to be filed before this Court.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the petitioner is not an accused, that the petitioner's son is arrayed as A2 in this case and that the vehicle was not involved in any other case previously. He would further submit that investigation is pending and that confiscation proceeding was initiated by the concerned Deputy Superintendent of Police.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the vehicle bearing Registration No.No.TN-94-V-3137 is owned by the petitioner, that the said vehicle has no connection whatever with the alleged occurrence, that if the vehicle is kept in open place, the value of the said vehicle will get deteriorated and that therefore interim custody may be granted to the petitioner.
7. It is also not in dispute that the vehicle in question was seized on 01.05.2022 and as of now, no confiscation order was passed by the concerned authority.
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that if the vehicle is kept in open place exposing to sun and rain, the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated and no purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle in custody, this Court is inclined to allow the revision and thereby setting aside the impugned order dated 09.06.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2668 of 2022, by the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur.
9. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 09.06.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.2668 of 2022 in Crime No.203 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur, is hereby set aside and the vehicle / Maruti Swift Dzire bearing Registration No.TN-94-V-3137, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the concern Department or by the Court on the following conditions:-
(a) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) as non-refun
Interim custody of seized vehicle granted despite offence risk, prioritizing prevention of deterioration on conditions.
Interim custody of seized vehicle granted due to risk of deterioration outweighing retention, subject to conditions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the trial Court has the power to consider the application for interim custody of the vehicle under Section 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. in cases ari....
Interim custody of seized vehicle granted to prevent deterioration, despite NDPS offence allegations.
An innocent owner is entitled to interim custody of a seized vehicle pending trial under the NDPS Act, as supported by Section 60(3) of the Act.
The court's decision was based on the lack of a confiscation order and the potential deterioration of the vehicle's value if kept in custody.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.