SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2889

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
P. Thiyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Egmore, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Vijaykumar, V. Karthikeyan, Advocates, C. Venkadesan, Legal Aid Counsel. For the Respondent:S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in Crl.R.C.No.511 of 2019: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for records and set aside the judgments passed in C.A.No.276 of 2017 dated 16.11.2018 by the Court of Sessions, Chennai by confirming the judgment passed in C.C.No.2137 of 2012 dated 12.09.2017 by the learned III- Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai.)

Common Order

1. The Crl.R.C.Nos.511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522 and 523 of 2019 are filed by the first accused namely, Thiyagarajan and Crl.R.C.Nos.847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858 and 859 of 2019 are filed by the second accused namely, Jayachandran. All these cases are connected to each other and arise out of a common transaction and therefore taken up and are disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The second accused in this case namely, Jayachandran was functioning as a Property Clerk in the Court of the Principal Special Judge, NDPS Court, Chennai and he was about to superannuate on 30.06.2005. Therefore, just before his retirement, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top