SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2898

P. VELMURUGAN
Celeste Jayakar – Appellant
Versus
Olney Aaron – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties:K. Sekar, Jessi Jeeva Priya, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in A.S(MD).No.94 of 2013: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2012 made by the learned II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin in O.S.No.31 of 2011 and dismiss the suit.

In Cross Objection (MD) No.15 of 2013: Cross Objections filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code, to set a side the decree and judgment dated 30.11.2012, rendered in O.S.No.31 of 2011, on the file of the second Additional District Judge, Thoothukudi, in so far it related to the dismissal of the suit as against the first Cross Objector/1st respondent is concerned, in the above appeal in A.S.No.94 of 2013, on the file of this Court, by allowing this Cross objections.)

Common Judgment:

1. This Appeal Suit has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree of the learned II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin dated 30.11.2012 made in O.S.No.31 of 2011. The respondents in the appeal have also filed Cross Objection against the findings that the first respondent is not entitled to any share.

2. The appellant is the defendant in O.S.No.31 of 2011, on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Tuticorin. The resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top