SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Arthur Robbert – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the records and quash the charge sheet against the Petitioner in the case in C.C.No.170 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kancheepuram.)
1. This Petition has been filed to quash the case in C.C.No.170 of 2020 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kancheepuram.
2. Mr.P.Nagarajan, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted his arguments. As per his submissions, the Petitioner sold the property for which the Civil Court has already granted a decree in favour of the Wife of the Petitioner. The husband of the Defendant/Defacto Complainant viz., Vimalsingh had executed a Power of Attorney regarding the land in Survey No.22/5 at Thiruvancheery Village, Mappedu Madhura, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District to an extent of 18 cents which was purchased by him from one Mr.Balamurugan, a Power Agent of one Lakshmipathi Naidu in the year 1993 through a registered sale deed vide document bearing D.No. 2694/1993 dated 07.07.1993. The husband of the defacto Complainant Vimalsingh executed a general Power of Attorney in favour of one
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.