SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2977

C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
V. Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
R. Perumal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:M. Sriram, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3: No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayers: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No. 73 of 1994, and dated 30.06.1994, on the file of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No. 11628 of 1989 and dated 22.10.1991, on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras.

This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No. 66 of 1994, on the file of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No. 9947 of 1988 and dated 22.10.1991, on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras.)

Common Judgment:

The defendants in O.S.No. 9947 of 1988 on the file of the VII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, are the appellants in S.A.No. 1441 of 2000.

2. The defendants in O.S.No. 11628 of 1989 on the file of the VII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, are the appellants in S.A.No. 1440 of 2000.

3. Joint trial was conducted in O.S.No. 9947 of 1988 and O.S.No. 11628 of 1989 and by Judgment dated 22.10.1991, both the suits were decreed, expect for the relief of mandatory i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top