Back
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Anbazhagan @ London Anbazhagan – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Nagapattinam – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagapatinam and set aside the order dated 29.08.2022 in Cr.M.P.No.975 of 2022.)
1. The revision is filed aggrieved by the order of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam dated 29.08.2022 in Cr.M.P.No.975 of 2022. In Cr.M.P.No.779 of 2022, in and by which the bail which is granted by the Trial Court earlier was cancelled. The ground on which the bail was cancelled is that the petitioner is a person having antecedents of seven previous cases. This was not brought to the notice of the Court at the time of release of petitioner on bail. Therefore, on this sole ground, the bail is cancelled.
2. Heard Mr.K.Balu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was in custody for eleven days. He would further sumbit that it was not the fault of the petitioner or his counsel, in not bringing the antecedents to the notice
Cancellation of bail requires evidence of misconduct or supervening circumstances; absence of such leads to dismissal of the petition.
The court emphasized the necessity of disclosing criminal antecedents in bail applications, particularly for legal professionals, and upheld the clean hands doctrine in the context of anticipatory ba....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
