SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3221

V. M. VELUMANI, S. SOUNTHAR
Lalitha – Appellant
Versus
S. Murugesan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:T. Dhanasekaran, Advocate. For the Respondents:I. Abrar Md. Abdulla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2014 made in O.S.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Hosur.)

V.M. Velumani, J.

1. The appellants are the plaintiffs and respondents are defendants in O.S.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Hosur. The appellants filed the said suit for partition of the suit property into five equal shares, allotment of three shares to the plaintiffs and for separate possession by way of passing preliminary decree, against the respondents and to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to divide the suit property into five equal shares and allot three shares to the plaintiffs with separate possession by way of passing final decree in the suit. After contest, the said suit was dismissed by the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2014.

2. The unsuccessful plaintiffs have come out with the present appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2014 made in O.S.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Hosur. Case of the appellants:

3. According to the appellants, suit property originally belon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top