Back
V. M. VELUMANI, V. SIVAGNANAM
Divisional Manager The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Sathuvachari, Vellore – Appellant
Versus
Devagi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.840 of 2013 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.)
This Cross Objection is filed under Order XLI Rule 22 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.840 of 2013 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.)
Common Judgment:
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. C.M.A.No.2036 of 2018 has been filed by the appellant/Insurance Company against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.840 of 2013 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai. Cross Objection No.61 of 2022 has been filed by the claimants/respondents 1 to 4 herein seeking enhancement of the compensation granted by the Tribunal in the said award.
2.The appellant/Insurance Company is the 2nd respondent in M.C.O.P.No.840 of 2013 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai. The respondents 1 to 4 filed the said claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- as compensation
The main legal point established is the determination of negligence in a motor accident case and the calculation of compensation based on notional income and future prospects.
The court enhanced the compensation for death in a motor accident, establishing the deceased's notional income and confirming the negligence of the Lorry driver.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the insurance company under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and the modification of compensation based on legal precedents.
The court ruled that the insurance company was not liable due to a fabricated policy, and compensation was adjusted based on the deceased's income and dependents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the apportionment of negligence between the parties involved in the accident and the determination of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Claimants cannot pursue simultaneous claims under Sections 163(A) and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act in the same petition; evidence must substantiate claims when seeking compensation.
The judgment establishes the principle of contributory negligence and provides a detailed framework for calculating compensation in motor accident claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
