SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
S. Dharmaraj – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India, Rep. by its Senior Manager, Ariyalur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition had been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 21.10.2019 in E.P.No.60 of 2019 in P.L.C.No.100 of 2018 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.)
1. This Civil Revision Petition had been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decretal order 21.10.2019 in E.P.No.60 of 2019 in P.L.C.No.100 of 2018 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.
2. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that in the award passed by the Lok Adalat held on 06.09.2018 the subsidy amount of Rs.2,68,750 that was to be paid to the Petitioner in this Revision Petition/Judgment Debtor before the Executing Court by the NABARD Bank was not at all considered.
3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner invited the attention of this Court to the proceedings of the Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry Department, a copy of which is enclosed in the typed set of papers filed along with this Petition, the e-mail communication for the NABARD Subsidy and the Counter filed by the Petitioner herein as Respondent in the Execution Petition No.60 of 2019. Theref
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.