SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3645

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
M. Karthik Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Leela Sathya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. S. Nandhini, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Nalliappan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside judgment dated 21.02.2019 passed in Criminal Appeal No.155 of 2018 on the file of III Additional Sessions Judge at Salem, thereby reversing the judgment dated 18.05.2018 passed in D.V.O.P.No.71 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate cum Additional Mahila Court at Salem.)

1.The petitioner husband has filed this writ petition aggrieved by the order of the learned Magistrate passed in the domestic violence petition filed by the respondent wife in and by which, the Trial Court ordered a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- for the domestic violence and also a monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month, the same have been confirmed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Salem in Crl.A.No.155 of 2018.

2. Heard the learned counsel M/s.S. Nandhini for the petitioner and Mr.R.Nalliappan, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner taking this Court through the petition and counter filed and the orders passed by the Courts below, would submit that this is the case in which complaint of not having physical relationship, the respondent wif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top