IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
S.J.Abul Hassan – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board – Respondent
C.R.P.Nos.964, 1311 and 1333 of 2022
Decided on : 25-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article,227 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 92 – Wakf Act, 1995 – Section 17, 83(9) – Every High Court shall have superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout territories interrelation to which it exercises jurisdiction – Tamil Nadu Wakf Board appointing respondents was challenged before Wakf Tribunal – In C.R.P in addition to order passed by Wakf Baord, petitioner challenged order passed by respondent therein as confirmed by email – For convenience, parties are referred as per rank – Held, Therefore, Court hold, order passed by second respondent d and consequential executive order and email by Chief Executive Officer of Wakf are liable to be set aside on two grounds namely for want of valid resolution by first – Petitions allowed.
ORDER :
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order made in O.A.No.21 of 2021, dated 28.02.2022 and made in, on the file of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai.
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order made in O.A.No.41 of 2021, dated 28.02.2022 and made in, on the file of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai.
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order made in O.A.No.25 of 2021, dated 28.02.2022 and made in, on the file of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai.
These Civil Revision Petitions are filed challenging the order passed by the Wakf Tribunal, dismissing the original application filed by the petitioner, challenging the appointment of respondents 3 to 11 as Trustees of Adirampattinam Madarasatul Salahifi Aththarameel Falahi @ M.K.N. Madarasa Trust, Adirampattinam in CRP.Nos.964 and 1333 of 2022, the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board appointing respondents 3 to 11 was challenged before the Wakf Tribunal.
2. In C.R.P.No.1311 of 2022 in addition to the order dated 23.02.2021 passed by the Wakf Baord, the petitioner challenged the order passed by the 12th respondent therein dated 22.02.2021 as confirmed by email dated 01.03.2021. For convenience, parties are referred as per the rank in
3. The Adirampattinam Madarasatul Salahifi Aththarameel Falahi @ M.K.N. Madarasa Trust, Adirampattinam was founded by Khadir Mohideen Marakayar, nearly a century ago and he endowed vast extent of wet and dry land measuring about 1500 acres, with the noble object of providing religious education through Madarasas. The management of the wakf is vested with a committee consisting 9 trustees, of them 6 are hereditary trustees and three trustees are non hereditary trustees. The District Court, Tanjavur framed a scheme for the proper administration of the Wakf in a suit filed under Section 92 of CPC in O.S. No.21 of 1952. The scheme was subsequently amended in the year 1954 and the same was also confirmed by the Apex Court. Subsequently, a fresh scheme decree was passed in O.S.No.6 of 1970 amending the original scheme. As per the scheme decree, the District Court, Thanjavur had been actually nominating the trustees once in three years.
4. After coming into force of new Wakf Act in the year 1995, the power to frame scheme and nominate trustees as per the scheme in respect of the Waqf's in India was vested with the respective Wakf Boards. The provisions of the said Act was challenged before this Court in a Writ Petition W.P(MD).No.15524 of 2012. The said writ petition along with the Civil Revision Petitions challenging the appointment made by the Principal District Judge, Tanjavur, dated 21.09.2012 was considered by this Court and the validity of the statutory provisions vesting the power of appointing Trustees to the Wakf by the State Waqf Boards was upheld. The Division Bench of this Court, while upholding the vires of the Act also set aside the appointments made by the Principal District Judge, Tanjavur and directed Tamil Nadu State Wakf Board to appoint the Trustees. The relevant portion of the order passed by this Court is as follows:
Thereafter, the appointments were made to the Wakf by the Tamil Nadu State Waqf Board from time to time.
5. As per the scheme, the
The Chief Executive Officer of a Wakf must issue notifications for appointments made by the Wakf Board unless serious allegations of moral turpitude are present against individuals selected.
The court held that judicial observations made during interim writ proceedings regarding the eligibility of public appointees do not constitute binding findings that preclude a statutory tribunal fro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the lack of clear guidelines for the appointment of Mutawalli, leading to biased and arbitrary decisions by the Wakf Board, and the intervention of....
The Waqf Board must adhere to the rules of succession as per the waqf deed, reinforcing the principle of governance according to established customs and the intent of the waqif.
The appointment of Mutawalli is not by rule of primogenitor and must be based on the person's competence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.