SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 434

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
K. Roseline Mallika – Appellant
Versus
A. R. V. Balachandar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D.S. Ramesh

ORDER :

Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order of the Trial Court dated 23.12.2021 made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.4701 of 2019 on the file of VII Additional Court, Chennai and allow the above said I.A.

The civil revision petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 23.12.2021 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.4701 of 2019. The revision petitioner is the defendant and the respondent instituted a suit for recovery of money.

2. The suit was instituted based on the impugned promissory note executed by the revision petitioner/defendant. The revision petitioner filed an Interlocutory Application in I.A.No.1 of 2019 seeking permission from the Trial Court to defend the suit for recovery of money filed on the promissory notes. The Trial Court considered the grounds raised by the revision petitioner elaborately and made a finding that the version of the defendant in the leave to defend the petition is totally contrary to her version in the police complaint made on 15.02.2012.

3. The police complaint given by the defendant to the Commissioner of Police dated 15.02.2012 would show that the defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top