SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 491

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
V. Shanmugam (Deceased) & Others - Appellants
Versus
Union of India Rep by the Secretary Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Chennai & Others - Respondents
W.P.No. 2191 of 2015
Decided On : 23-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:M. Radhakrishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, M. Arvind Kumar, Senior Central Government Panel Counsel, R2 & R3, P. Kumaresan, Additional Advocate General Assisted by T.Arun Kumar, Additional Government Pleader, R4 & R5, V. Meenakshi Sundaram, R6, M. Arun Kumar for M/s. Sampath Kumar & Associates, R7 & R8, G. Saravanan, Advocates, R9 & R10, No Appearance.

The judgment established that the duty of care and negligence principles apply even in voluntary activities, holding the college responsible for failing to ensure safety measures.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Compensation for Death of Student - National Service Scheme - Negligence - Duty of Care - Voluntary Participation - Approval and Safety Measures - Liability of Authorities

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought compensation for the death of his son, a student who drowned during a coastal clean-up program organized by a college. The college and authorities denied liability, stating the student voluntarily entered the sea against instructions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the college failed to obtain necessary approval and inform relevant authorities, constituting a milder form of negligence. It held the college responsible for not ensuring safety measures, directing it to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,000 to the petitioners.

Issues: The issues involved negligence, duty of care, voluntary participation, and liability of authorities in organizing the coastal clean-up program.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the college's failure to obtain approval and ensure safety measures constituted a milder form of negligence, making it liable for compensation.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, directing the college to pay Rs.5,00,000 as compensation to the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the petitioner a minimum compensation of Rupees Twenty Five Lakhs with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of this writ petition till date of payment for the death of his son S.Madhanagopal, who was 3rd year B.E. (EEE) student in Pallavan College of Engineering, Thimmasamudram, Kancheepuram 631 502.)

The Writ of Mandamus is filed to direct the respondents to pay the petitioner a minimum compensation of Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees wenty Five Lakhs) with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the present writ petition till the date of payment for the death of the son of the writ petitioner S.Madhanagopal, who was a 3rd year B.E. (EEE) student in the Pallavan College of Engineering, Thimmasamudram, Kancheepuram.

2. The 1st petitioner states that he hails from a poor family and is running a tea stall at Pallikudathan Street, Kancheepuram. He had two children, a daughter and son. His son, S.Madhanagopal was studying in the 8th respondent / Pallavan College of Engineering. He was doing B.E. (EEE) 3rd year. Unfortunately, the son of the 1st petitioner died on 27.09.2014, while participating in the NSS Programme called “International Coastal Clean-up” organised by the respondents 4, 6 and 8 in the coastal area from Koovathur to Thenpattinam, Kancheepuram District. There were 54 students along with the son of the petitioner. His son left home at 6:00 a.m. on 27.09.2014 to participate in the said programme. At about 3:00 p.m on 27.09.2014, the family members of the petitioner were informed through residential phone by the 10th respondent that his son had died about 2:00 p.m. drowning in the sea. The respondents 7 to 10, who were responsible for the safety of my son, had not even cared to give a complaint to the Police about the death of the son of the petitioner.

3. A Police complaint was registered in E5 Koovathur Police Station, Kancheepuram District. A legal notice was issued by the father-in-law of the 1st petitioner on 04.10.2014 to the 8th respondent and other authorities. The 8th respondent sent a reply by stating that due care and diligence was taken by the faculty members and the son of the petitioner himself invited the fatal end and therefore, the College is not responsible. During the pendency of the writ petition, the 1st petitioner died on 20.04.2020. Subsequently, wife and daughter of 1st petitioner were substituted in the writ petition.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the National Service Scheme (NSS) falls under the 1st respondent / Union of India, who is responsible for the administration, policy planning, implementation and evaluation of NSS Programmes. The State of Tamil Nadu has a public duty to explain the policies of 1st respondent regarding NSS Programme to the youth and to implement successfully all NSS Programmes. The Government of India extends financial assistance for establishing the State NSS Cell.

5. The 9th respondent is the NSS coordinator in the 8th respondent / College. The 5th respondent is the NSS coordinator at the University level and the 9th respondent is the NSS coordinator at the College level. They have conducted the programme called “International Coastal Clean-up”. The NSS Programmes are conducted by utilising the public funds. The 3rd respondent being the District Collector of Kancheepuram District ought to have taken adequate safety measures with the help of the Coast Guard Personnel to oversee the entire coastal clean-up in the said coastal area. When the two students viz., son of the 1st petitioner and one Lalith Kumar were drowning in the sea, a courageous student namely Michael Antony jumped into the sea and tried his best to save both of them, but unfortunately, Lalith Kumar alone could be saved. None from the Coastal Guard Department was available to save the lives of the students in the ev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top