SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 520

R. THARANI
Rengasamy – Appellant
Versus
Krishnan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:C.K.M. Appaji, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, No appearance, R2, V. Sakthivel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer:This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award, dated 29.06.2018, in M.C.O.P. No.45 of 2017, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal – Special Sub Court, Dindigul.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to enhance the compensation amount in M.C.O.P. No.45 of 2017, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal – Special Sub Court, Dindigul, dated 29.06.2018. The appellant herein is the claimant and the respondents herein are the respondents in the original M.C.O.P. Petition.

2. A brief substance of the petition, in M.C.O.P. No.45 of 2017, is as follows:-

    On 03.08.2016, at about 05.30 pm., when the petitioner was riding a two wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-58-P-0880 keeping the left edge of the road, a Milk van bearing Registration No.TN-57-AB-6798 came from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the petitioner. The petitioner sustained injuries. He was taken to Dindigul Government Hospital and after getting first aid, he was admi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top