Back
M. SUNDAR, M. NIRMAL KUMAR
S. Bhavani – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Home, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to produce the body of the detenu namely, Parameshwaran, son of Murugan, aged about 23 years who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore before this Hon''ble Court and set him at liberty forthwith by calling for the records pertaining to the detention order dated 28.08.2022 made in D.O.No.C2/42/2022 passed by the 2nd respondent, quash the same as illegal.)
M. Sundar, J.,
1. Captioned ''Habeas Corpus Petition'' [''HCP'' for the sake of brevity] has been filed by wife of the detenu assailing a ''preventive detention order dated 28.08.2022 bearing reference D.O.No.C2/42/2022'' [hereinafter ''impugned detention order'' for the sake of convenience and brevity]. To be noted, fifth respondent is the sponsoring authority and second respondent is the detaining authority as the impugned detention order has been made by second respondent.
2. Impugned detention order has been made under ''The Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber law offenders, Drug-offenders, Forest-offenders, Goondas, Immoral traffic offenders, Sand-offenders, Sexual-offende
Failure to provide a crucial document in the language known to the detenu rendered the impugned detention order illegal, leading to its setting aside.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to provide crucial documents in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective r....
The failure to provide a correct translation of crucial documents in a language known to the detenu can impair the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the det....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing translated copies in a language the detenu is conversant with, as mandated by Article 22(5) of the Constitution of I....
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ill....
The failure to provide a correct translated copy of a crucial document in the language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the....
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ill....
The failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impaired his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering his continued detenti....
Failure to provide a translated version of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
