Back
M. SUNDAR, M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Valli – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to call for the records in Memo No.219/BCDFGISSSV/2022 dated 27.07.2022 on the file of second respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and produce the detenue Santhoshkumar, son of Sekar, aged about 22 years, who is Confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and set him at liberty.)
M. Sundar, J.
1. Captioned ''Habeas Corpus Petition'' [''HCP'' for the sake of brevity] has been filed by mother of detenu assailing a ''preventive detention order dated 27.07.2022 bearing reference Memo No.219/BCDFGISSSV/2022'' [hereinafter ''impugned detention order'' for the sake of convenience and brevity]. To be noted, third respondent is the sponsoring authority and second respondent is the detaining authority as impugned detention order has been made by second respondent.
2. Impugned detention order has been made under ''The Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber law offenders, Drug-offenders, Forest-offenders, Goondas, Immoral traffic offenders, Sand-offenders, Sexual-offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirates Act,
The failure to provide a correct translation of crucial documents in a language known to the detenu can impair the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the det....
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ill....
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention ill....
The failure to provide a correct translated copy of a crucial document in the language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to provide crucial documents in a language known to the detenu impairs the detenu's constitutional right to make an effective r....
Failure to provide a crucial document in the language known to the detenu rendered the impugned detention order illegal, leading to its setting aside.
The failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impaired his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering his continued detenti....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to provide the correct translation of crucial documents in the detenu's known language impairs their constitutional right to ma....
Failure to provide a translated copy of a crucial document in a language known to the detenu impaired his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention illegal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
